ITAT Judgment contain Income Tax related Judgments from Income Tax Appellate Tribunal Across India which includes ITAT Mumbai, Chennai, Delhi, Kolkutta, Hyderabad etc.
Income Tax : Article examines whether the MLI Principal Purpose Test has domestic effect under Section 90(1) following Nestlé SA and Sky High ...
Corporate Law : The article argues that failure to comply before the AO or CIT(A) can lead to adverse assessments, as higher forums generally cann...
Income Tax : ITAT held that Section 54 exemption must be examined separately for each residential house sold. Aggregating gains from multiple t...
Income Tax : ITAT held that delayed filing of Form 10B cannot defeat Section 11 exemption if the audit report is available before processing un...
Income Tax : Smt. Ranjana Kumari/Kalta Vs DCIT/ACIT (Central) (ITAT Chandigarh) The appeals involved three assessees belonging to the Kalta Gro...
Income Tax : ITAT Bangalore held Section 2(47)(v) inapplicable as the JDA did not satisfy Section 53A conditions, deleting capital gains for AY...
Income Tax : The issue concerns massive backlog in ITAT caused by unfilled positions and delayed appointments. The intervention highlights that...
Income Tax : A representation seeks doubling the SMC threshold due to inflation and higher dispute values. The key takeaway is that increasing ...
Income Tax : The tribunal held that a gift deed alone cannot establish legitimacy under Section 68. It directed fresh scrutiny of the donor’s...
Income Tax : Delhi ITAT allows Sanco Holding, a Norwegian company, to compute income from bareboat charter of seismic vessels under Article 21(...
Income Tax : ITAT Pune allowed deduction under Section 80P(2)(d) on dividend from co-operative banks, following coordinate bench decisions for ...
Income Tax : ITAT Pune remanded the Section 80P deduction issue for fresh assessment after noting relevant precedents and directing reconsidera...
Income Tax : ITAT Pune allowed deduction under Section 80P(2)(a)(i) on interest from co-operative bank deposits, following binding judicial pre...
Income Tax : Chennai ITAT held Section 50C provisos applicable to oral agreements backed by bank payments and deleted related additions, remand...
Income Tax : Chennai ITAT deleted the Section 271D penalty, holding temporary cash received to demonstrate visa funds was not a loan attracting...
Income Tax : The ITAT Delhi has revised its hearing notice protocols. Physical notices will now be sent only once, with subsequent dates availa...
Income Tax : ITAT Chandigarh held that ITO Ward-3(1), Chandigarh had no jurisdiction to issue notice to an NRI and hence consequently the asses...
Income Tax : Central Government is pleased to appoint Shri G. S. Pannu, Vice-President of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, as President of th...
Income Tax : Ministry of Finance notified rules for appointment of members in various tribunals on 12.02.2020 in which practice of judicial and...
Income Tax : Bhagyalaxmi Conclave Pvt. Ltd. Vs DCIT (ITAT Kolkata) In the remand report, the AO clearly stated that notice u/s 143(2) of the Ac...
ITAT Mumbai held that purchases supported by invoices, e-way bills, transport records, bank payments, and GST documents cannot be treated as bogus merely because of allegations against the supplier. The Tribunal deleted the entire addition after finding no contrary evidence.
The case examined whether compulsorily convertible debentures should be treated as debt or equity for allowing interest deductions. The Tribunal identified this as the primary issue before determining the arm’s length price of interest.
The ITAT Bangalore held that, from AY 2018-19 onwards, Section 80AC makes timely filing of the return under Section 139(1) a mandatory condition for claiming deductions under Chapter VI-A. A return filed later in response to a Section 148 notice could not revive the claim for deduction under Section 80P.
ITAT Ahmedabad held that repayment of the entire loan with TDS-compliant interest payments undermined the allegation that the loans were accommodation entries. The additions towards interest and commission were deleted.
ITAT Chennai held that loose sheets and estimates alone cannot justify an addition under Section 69B without independent corroborative evidence. The Tribunal deleted the addition after finding no proof of investment outside the books of account.
Tribunal held that the estimated disallowance under Section 14A should be restricted and should not form part of book profits, following the Special Bench decision in Vireet Investments Pvt. Ltd.
ITAT Rajkot held that cash transactions between close family members do not constitute loans or deposits under Sections 269SS and 269T. Following the Gujarat High Court’s precedent, it deleted penalties under Sections 271D and 271E.
The ITAT Nagpur held that investments already disclosed in the balance sheet could not be treated as unexplained investments. It deleted the addition after finding that the Assessing Officer had added disclosed investments.
The ITAT set aside the rejection of registration under Section 12AB after noting that only one opportunity of hearing had been provided. The matter was remanded for fresh adjudication with directions to allow the assessee to submit supporting documents.
The Hyderabad ITAT held that incomplete data retrieved from an inoperative computer could not prevail over audited books of account. It deleted the addition after finding no evidence of suppressed receipts or unexplained expenditure.
