Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Nalwad Prabhu0 Somashekharappa Vs ITO (ITAT Bangalore)
Related Assessment Year : 2018-19
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Nalwad Prabhu Somashekharappa Vs ITO (ITAT Bangalore) Section 54F Claim Revived – ITAT Allows Fresh Chance to Prove Construction with Additional Evidence The ITAT Bangalore restored the issue of Section 54F deduction to the Assessing Officer, holding that the assessee should be given an opportunity to substantiate the claim with comprehensive documentary evidence. In this case, the assessee claimed deduction of about ₹11.61 lakhs under Section 54F on capital gains arising from sale of property, stating that the amount was invested in construction of a residential house jointly with his bro...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

ITAT Mumbai: No Penalty U/s 271(1)(c) on Estimated Bogus Purchase Additions ITAT Mumbai: Sec 54 Claim Cannot Be Denied Merely for No Original Return-Allowed in Reassessment SC: Partnership Cannot Be Used to Mask Illegal Sub-Lease; Courts Will Lift the Veil ITAT Mumbai: On-Money Addition Based on Third-Party Evidence Excel Sheets Deleted Third-Party Excel Sheets & Statements Without Corroboration Have No Evidentiary Value View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Ads Free tax News and Updates
Search Post by Date
April 2026
M T W T F S S
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
27282930