ITAT Judgment contain Income Tax related Judgments from Income Tax Appellate Tribunal Across India which includes ITAT Mumbai, Chennai, Delhi, Kolkutta, Hyderabad etc.
Income Tax : Article examines whether the MLI Principal Purpose Test has domestic effect under Section 90(1) following Nestlé SA and Sky High ...
Corporate Law : The article argues that failure to comply before the AO or CIT(A) can lead to adverse assessments, as higher forums generally cann...
Income Tax : ITAT held that Section 54 exemption must be examined separately for each residential house sold. Aggregating gains from multiple t...
Income Tax : ITAT held that delayed filing of Form 10B cannot defeat Section 11 exemption if the audit report is available before processing un...
Income Tax : Smt. Ranjana Kumari/Kalta Vs DCIT/ACIT (Central) (ITAT Chandigarh) The appeals involved three assessees belonging to the Kalta Gro...
Income Tax : ITAT Bangalore held Section 2(47)(v) inapplicable as the JDA did not satisfy Section 53A conditions, deleting capital gains for AY...
Income Tax : The issue concerns massive backlog in ITAT caused by unfilled positions and delayed appointments. The intervention highlights that...
Income Tax : A representation seeks doubling the SMC threshold due to inflation and higher dispute values. The key takeaway is that increasing ...
Income Tax : The tribunal held that a gift deed alone cannot establish legitimacy under Section 68. It directed fresh scrutiny of the donor’s...
Income Tax : Delhi ITAT allows Sanco Holding, a Norwegian company, to compute income from bareboat charter of seismic vessels under Article 21(...
Income Tax : ITAT Pune allowed deduction under Section 80P(2)(a)(i) on interest and dividend income from co-operative bank deposits, setting as...
Income Tax : ITAT Pune allowed deduction under Section 80P(2)(a)(i) on interest from deposits with co-operative and scheduled banks, following ...
Income Tax : ITAT Pune allowed deduction under Sections 80P(2)(a)(i) and 80P(2)(d) on interest earned from deposits with co-operative and sched...
Income Tax : Hyderabad ITAT upheld capital gains on a registered sale deed but remanded LTCG computation for fresh verification of the cost of ...
Income Tax : ITAT Pune allowed deduction under Section 80P(2)(d) on dividend from co-operative banks, following coordinate bench decisions for ...
Income Tax : The ITAT Delhi has revised its hearing notice protocols. Physical notices will now be sent only once, with subsequent dates availa...
Income Tax : ITAT Chandigarh held that ITO Ward-3(1), Chandigarh had no jurisdiction to issue notice to an NRI and hence consequently the asses...
Income Tax : Central Government is pleased to appoint Shri G. S. Pannu, Vice-President of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, as President of th...
Income Tax : Ministry of Finance notified rules for appointment of members in various tribunals on 12.02.2020 in which practice of judicial and...
Income Tax : Bhagyalaxmi Conclave Pvt. Ltd. Vs DCIT (ITAT Kolkata) In the remand report, the AO clearly stated that notice u/s 143(2) of the Ac...
The ITAT Delhi held that an omnibus satisfaction note without identifying year-wise incriminating material or its relevance to the assessee’s income cannot sustain proceedings under Section 153C. The assessments were consequently quashed without examining the merits of the additions.
The ITAT Delhi held that dumpers used in manufacturing and mining operations are part of plant and machinery and qualify for additional depreciation under Section 32(1)(iia). It ruled that actual use, and not merely road-going capability, determines eligibility.
ITAT Delhi held that a reassessment initiated by an Assessing Officer without pecuniary jurisdiction under CBDT Instruction No. 1/2011 is invalid. The Tribunal quashed the reassessment and dismissed the Revenues appeal.
The ITAT held that reassessment was invalid because the Assessing Officer did not dispose of the assessee’s objections through a separate speaking order before completing reassessment. The Tribunal quashed the reassessment following the principles laid down in GKN Driveshafts.
The dispute concerned deduction of CSR expenditure incurred before Explanation 2 to section 37(1) became applicable. The ITAT held that the contribution, made under Ministry of Shipping guidelines, was allowable for AY 2012-13. The decision emphasised that the statutory bar introduced from AY 2015-16 could not be applied retrospectively.
The ITAT held that relying on tally data and a forensic report without providing them to the assessee violated principles of natural justice. The matter was remanded to the Assessing Officer while retaining the commission rate at 0.15%.
The ITAT Pune held that Section 80-IAC does not require startups to complete three years before claiming the deduction. It directed the Assessing Officer to allow the deduction from the first eligible assessment year.
ITAT held that the Assessing Officer must implement the terms of the later APA covering royalty payments to the AE. The ruling required fresh effect to be given based on the modified return.
The Tribunal held that transfer pricing adjustments must be based on international transactions and not entity-level figures. It remanded the matter after finding errors in the computation of the arm’s length price.
Expenditure of ₹4.49 crore incurred on maintenance dredging for removal of natural siltation and restoration of the existing operational depth of the jetty constituted revenue expenditure allowable under section 37(1). Accordingly, the disallowance made by AO and sustained by CIT(A) was deleted.
