Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Jamshed Naval Karanjia Vs CIT (ITAT Mumbai)
Related Assessment Year : 2017-18
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Jamshed Naval Karanjia Vs CIT (ITAT Mumbai) Demonetisation Cash Addition Deleted – ITAT Accepts Family Savings Explanation Backed by Affidavit The ITAT Mumbai deleted the addition of ₹6.70 lakhs made under Section 69A, holding that the assessee’s explanation regarding source of cash deposits during demonetisation was plausible and supported by evidence. In this case, the assessee, a non-resident individual, had deposited cash during the demonetisation period. The AO treated the amount as unexplained and made addition under Section 69A, which was partly sustained by the CIT(A). Before...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Reopening Fails on Both Counts: Invalid Sec 148A Notice and Time-Barred Sec 148 Render Assessment Void Coffee Income: Rule 7B Overrides Rule 7 – ITAT Remands for Segregation of Own vs Purchased Produce Duty Drawback Taxable Only on Receipt – ITAT Deletes Addition & U/s 270A Penalty Skill Development = “Education” – ITAT Allows Sec 11 Exemption to Charitable Trust No Penalty for Wrong Claim or Head of Income – ITAT Deletes Section 271(1)(c) Penalty View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Ads Free tax News and Updates
Search Post by Date
April 2026
M T W T F S S
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
27282930