ITAT Judgments - Page 30

IT Support Services to Indian Entities by Foreign company cannot be taxed in India

Faurecia Systems D'echappement Vs ACIT (ITAT Pune)

The issue raised by the assessee challenging the action of AO in holding the income from providing IT support services as taxable for fees for technical services....

Read More

No Section 54 Exemption denial for Purchase of new property in the name of son

Bhagwan Swroop Pathak Vs ITO (ITAT Delhi)

The issue under consideration is whether the exemption u/s 54 can be denied only with the reason that the new property has been purchased in the name of son and not in the name of that assessee....

Read More

No Authority under Law to Levy Section 234E Penalty prior to 01.06.2015

Ajvin Infotech Pvt Ltd Vs DCIT (ITAT Delhi)

Therefore, according to the Finance Act, 2015, prior to 01.06.2015, your good self had no authority to levy fee, if any, under Section 234E of the Act and thus levy of fee under Section 234E of the Act while processing the statement is beyond the scope of Section 200A of the Act....

Read More

Section 11(2) exemption cannot be denied for mere non submission of Form 10 electronically

Parle Hindu Devalaya Mandal Vs DCIT (ITAT Mumbai)

Parle Hindu Devalaya Mandal Vs DCIT (ITAT Mumbai) The dispute in the present appeal is confined to denial of assessee’s claim of exemption under section 11(2) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The assessee is a charitable trust and has been granted registration under section 12AA of the Act. For the assessment year under dispute, […]...

Read More

No section 69 addition in absence of evidence to prove that payment made beyond sale agreement

Rajendra Kumar Vs DCIT (ITAT Delhi)

Since there was no material available before AO that assessee had paid anything more than what was mentioned in the sale deed, therefore, no addition was warranted in the instant case by invoking the provisions of section 69. ...

Read More

Section 41 addition cannot be made on basis of unsigned balance sheets

Rajshree Builder & Promoters Pvt. Ltd. Vs ITO (ITAT Delhi)

Addition by AO under section 41(1) as liability of ‘Trade Payables’ written off was not justified as the balance-sheets filed by assessee were neither signed by the Auditor nor by the Director and, therefore, the same were not reliable and assessee had failed to produce any confirmation to the effect that the assessee received payment...

Read More

Section Sec. 2(22)(e) not applicable to reimbursement of expenditure

Rajesh Rajkumar Nagpal Vs ACIT (ITAT Mumbai)

Rajesh Rajkumar Nagpal Vs ACIT (ITAT Mumbai) Provisions of 2(22)(e) were not applicable since the payment was mere reimbursement of expenditure. Ld. CIT(A) proceeded on wrong footing that the same would be personal expenditure and hence, disallowable completely overlooking the fact that the said expenditure has never been claimed by the a...

Read More

Bogus capital gains from penny stocks- ITAT restricts addition to 30%

Neha Chowdhary Vs ITO (ITAT Kolkata)

Neha Chowdhary Vs ITO (ITAT Kolkata) Bogus capital gains from penny stocks- It emerges that from a perusal of these case files that although the assessee has produced her documentary evidence before the lower authorities about the impugned sums to be in the nature of income derived from the sales of shares, the fact remains […]...

Read More

No Section 68 Addition for issue of Shares on Premium in lieu of shares

Blooming Tradelink Pvt. Ltd. Vs ITO (ITAT Kolkata)

The sole issue involved in this appeal of assessee is against the action of Ld. CIT(A) in confirming the addition of Rs.5,01,00,000/- made by AO u/s. 68 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as the Act) on account of bogus share capital including share premium...

Read More

Stamp duty value considered as full value of consideration if amount received via bank

Jagdish Dhanajirao Jadhav Vs ITO (ITAT Pune)

It is evident that the benefit of first proviso would be allowed only if the condition as stipulated in second proviso is satisfied. In other words, the stamp value on the date of agreement to sell shall be considered as full value of consideration only if the amount of consideration or part of such consideration was received by the asses...

Read More

Browse All Categories

CA, CS, CMA (4,807)
Company Law (6,168)
Custom Duty (7,796)
DGFT (4,244)
Excise Duty (4,368)
Fema / RBI (4,245)
Finance (4,457)
Income Tax (33,477)
SEBI (3,530)
Service Tax (3,564)

Search Posts by Date

July 2020