Corporate Law : The Supreme Court held that liabilities arising from corporate guarantees qualify as financial debt under Section 5(8) of the Inso...
Corporate Law : The Supreme Court ruled that a shortfall payment clause in a Deed of Hypothecation can qualify as a contract of guarantee under th...
Corporate Law : The article examines how conflicting Supreme Court judgments in Rainbow Papers and Raman Ispat created uncertainty regarding the s...
Corporate Law : The IBC (Amendment) Act, 2026 introduces CIIRP as a faster and proactive insolvency mechanism for early-stage financial stress. Th...
Corporate Law : Explains how the Court held that insolvency proceedings cannot be used as a pressure tactic for debt recovery. Even if default is ...
Corporate Law : The Supreme Court upheld joint insolvency proceedings against two interconnected real estate companies due to common management an...
Corporate Law : 2026 Guidelines streamline selection of Insolvency Professionals for IRP, RP, Liquidator, and Bankruptcy Trustee roles, ensuring t...
Corporate Law : The amendments replace the consultation committee with CoC oversight, giving creditors greater control over liquidation decisions....
Corporate Law : The proposal focuses on enabling creditors to initiate resolution while retaining debtor management under supervision. It sets out...
Corporate Law : The amendments arise from the inclusion of a unified “service provider” definition under the Code. The move expands regulatory...
Corporate Law : NCLT Indore held that dissolution under Section 54 of the IBC was justified after all assets of the corporate debtor were liquidat...
Corporate Law : NCLT Mumbai held that ongoing One-Time Settlement discussions cannot defeat insolvency proceedings when debt and default are admit...
Corporate Law : NCLAT held that foreign oil and gas assets owned through Videocon subsidiaries could not be included in the CIRP of Videocon Indus...
Corporate Law : Tribunal noted that the CIRP period, including all extensions, had reached 741 days and expired on 20 November 2025. Since no plan...
Corporate Law : The NCLT Mumbai held that liquidation became mandatory under Section 33(2) of the IBC after the Committee of Creditors rejected al...
Corporate Law : The amendment bars related parties, recent auditors, and connected persons from acting as registered valuers in pre-pack insolvenc...
Corporate Law : The IBBI amended the Liquidation Process Regulations, 2016 to allow appointment of one registered valuer for each asset class in M...
Corporate Law : The IBBI amended the CIRP Regulations, 2016 to permit appointment of one set of registered valuers for MSME corporate debtors. The...
Corporate Law : The IBBI Amendment Regulations, 2026 introduce nominee directors on IPA governing boards and strengthen oversight mechanisms. The ...
Corporate Law : The order highlights that delayed applications, late progress reports, and non-compliance with filing requirements amounted to ser...
NCLT Mumbai held that the Advance received by the Corporate Debtor against future supply of goods is an Operational Debt. Petition u/s. 9 of Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code admitted since Corporate Debtor failed to pay operational debt.
NCLAT Delhi held that as per section 33(2) of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, CoC is empowered to take decision to liquidate the Corporate Debtor thus resolution passed with 100% vote share directing for liquidation of Corporate Debtor [Go Airlines] justified.
There’s a lack of real space to unpack the inappropriateness of certain aspects of IBBI’s 2025 reforms is difficult: the reform questions it poses of the evolving structure and normative priorities of India’s insolvency regime are complex.
NCLT rules corporate debtor can raise pre-existing dispute even without timely reply to IBC Section 8 notice, rejects insolvency application.
IBBI’s First Appellate Authority disposes of RTI appeals concerning information on actions against a Resolution Professional and CoC details.
NCLAT Delhi held that in absence of both disbursements directly to Corporate Debtor and default, attempt to invoke proceedings u/s. 7 of IBC unsustainable. Thus, since CIRP was fraudulent and malicious, dismissal u/s. 65 of IBC upheld.
Adjudicating Authority admitted the application filed by Sri. Chandy John Samuel & Others against the Corporate Debtor u/s.7 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 for initiating the Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process.
NCLAT Delhi held that demand notice issued u/s. 95(4) of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 [IBC] when sent to last known address as stipulated in Guarantee Deed is valid service of notice under established legal principles. Accordingly, appeals dismissed.
NCLAT rules allottee who cancelled unit by request cannot be financial creditor. Order directs payment of settled bank loan.
IBBI’s First Appellate Authority dismisses Ravinder Aggarwal’s RTI appeal seeking details on MSA Developers’ resolution plan implementation.
