Corporate Law : NCLAT held that the CoC may decide to liquidate a corporate debtor under Section 33(2) before inviting resolution plans, with limi...
Corporate Law : This article explains why the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code places commercial decision-making in the hands of the Committee of Cr...
Corporate Law : The article explains how the NCLAT interpreted Section 66(1) to extend liability beyond company insiders to third parties who know...
Corporate Law : The Supreme Court held that individuals investing for financial returns rather than home ownership cannot invoke Section 7 of the ...
Corporate Law : The High Court held that a company cannot shift its registered office after approval of a resolution plan when appeals against the...
Corporate Law : IBBI has proposed amendments to CIRP, Liquidation, and Personal Guarantor Regulations to improve valuation, clarify RP duties, sim...
Corporate Law : The proposed amendments require comprehensive project-wise disclosures, technical assessments, and mandatory information in resolu...
Corporate Law : The Ministry of Corporate Affairs highlighted that the IBC resolution process facilitated creditor recoveries exceeding ₹4 lakh ...
Corporate Law : The IBBI has announced contractual vacancies for Research Associates and Consultants in law and business management disciplines. T...
Corporate Law : The Supreme Court upheld joint insolvency proceedings against two interconnected real estate companies due to common management an...
Corporate Law : Bombay HC held that Section 14 IBC moratorium does not prevent deemed conveyance under Section 11 MOFA and restored the society's ...
Company Law : Kerala HC held Rule 55 empowers NCLT to accept additional pleadings, setting aside refusal to entertain further objections in a Se...
Corporate Law : NCLAT held that invoice discounting through the TReDS platform does not convert operational debt into financial debt. The appeal w...
Corporate Law : Supreme Court held that a Section 7 IBC application can proceed despite pending winding-up proceedings where no irreversible stage...
Corporate Law : NCLT admitted the Section 9 petition after holding that campaign-related emails did not constitute a genuine pre-existing dispute....
Corporate Law : IBBI cancelled an IP’s registration over systemic CIRP misuse, flawed valuations, non-disclosures, compliance failures and lack ...
Corporate Law : IBBI has released the Phase 10 syllabus for the Limited Insolvency Examination, effective from October 1, 2026, to reflect evolvin...
Corporate Law : The First Appellate Authority directed the CPIO to dispose of the RTI application after finding it was not decided within the 30-d...
Corporate Law : The Disciplinary Committee found that the Resolution Professional delayed admission of a financial creditor's claim and failed to ...
Corporate Law : The Disciplinary Committee imposed a two-year suspension after finding failures in claim verification, unauthorized financial deci...
IBBI dismissed multiple RTI appeals challenging denial of a show cause notice copy. IBBI clarified no such notice existed and cited Supreme Court’s view that RTI should not be used for frivolous litigation.
The government provides details on pending cases at the NCLT, including year-wise and sector-wise breakdowns and measures being taken to expedite resolutions.
Appellant contended that as the SAP did not submit the balance sale consideration within a period of 90 days in terms of the auction document, it was contended that the Liquidator should have cancelled the auction.
A First Appellate Authority order from the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Board of India addresses two RTI appeals. The order discusses the definition of ‘information’ under the RTI Act and highlights the misuse of the RTI mechanism.
NCLT Ahmedabad held that application for initiation of Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process [CIRP] filed by Financial Creditor [SBI] u/s. 7 of IBC against Corporate Debtor [Raninga Paper Mills Private Limited] is admitted as existence of financial debt and default demonstrated.
NCLAT Delhi held that amount having not been received from the corporate debtor, there was no applicability of Section 14 of the IBC and moratorium was not applicable with regard to any payment by co-applicant. Thus, direction of adjudicating authority for reversal of amount is unsustainable.
Himachal Pradesh High Court held that extinguishment of debt under Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code [IBC] wouldn’t ipso facto apply to extinguishment of criminal proceedings under section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act [NI Act]. Accordingly, present petition fails.
Supreme Court held that the commercial wisdom of the CoC must, accordingly, be given primacy during the CIRP. Once CoC decides that retention of the possession of the subject property was not in the interest of the CIRP, that decision must be given the respect that is lawfully due to it.
Madras High Court has instructed NCLT to file detailed counter as NCLT has proceeded to appoint the Interim Resolution Professional [IRP] different from that suggested by Corporate Debtor [CD].
Supreme Court clarifies that IBC’s moratorium doesn’t stay criminal proceedings for cheque dishonour. Personal guarantors remain liable under the NI Act.
