Corporate Law : The Supreme Court held that liabilities arising from corporate guarantees qualify as financial debt under Section 5(8) of the Inso...
Corporate Law : The Supreme Court ruled that a shortfall payment clause in a Deed of Hypothecation can qualify as a contract of guarantee under th...
Corporate Law : The article examines how conflicting Supreme Court judgments in Rainbow Papers and Raman Ispat created uncertainty regarding the s...
Corporate Law : The IBC (Amendment) Act, 2026 introduces CIIRP as a faster and proactive insolvency mechanism for early-stage financial stress. Th...
Corporate Law : Explains how the Court held that insolvency proceedings cannot be used as a pressure tactic for debt recovery. Even if default is ...
Corporate Law : The Supreme Court upheld joint insolvency proceedings against two interconnected real estate companies due to common management an...
Corporate Law : 2026 Guidelines streamline selection of Insolvency Professionals for IRP, RP, Liquidator, and Bankruptcy Trustee roles, ensuring t...
Corporate Law : The amendments replace the consultation committee with CoC oversight, giving creditors greater control over liquidation decisions....
Corporate Law : The proposal focuses on enabling creditors to initiate resolution while retaining debtor management under supervision. It sets out...
Corporate Law : The amendments arise from the inclusion of a unified “service provider” definition under the Code. The move expands regulatory...
Corporate Law : NCLT Indore held that dissolution under Section 54 of the IBC was justified after all assets of the corporate debtor were liquidat...
Corporate Law : NCLT Mumbai held that ongoing One-Time Settlement discussions cannot defeat insolvency proceedings when debt and default are admit...
Corporate Law : NCLAT held that foreign oil and gas assets owned through Videocon subsidiaries could not be included in the CIRP of Videocon Indus...
Corporate Law : Tribunal noted that the CIRP period, including all extensions, had reached 741 days and expired on 20 November 2025. Since no plan...
Corporate Law : The NCLT Mumbai held that liquidation became mandatory under Section 33(2) of the IBC after the Committee of Creditors rejected al...
Corporate Law : The amendment bars related parties, recent auditors, and connected persons from acting as registered valuers in pre-pack insolvenc...
Corporate Law : The IBBI amended the Liquidation Process Regulations, 2016 to allow appointment of one registered valuer for each asset class in M...
Corporate Law : The IBBI amended the CIRP Regulations, 2016 to permit appointment of one set of registered valuers for MSME corporate debtors. The...
Corporate Law : The IBBI Amendment Regulations, 2026 introduce nominee directors on IPA governing boards and strengthen oversight mechanisms. The ...
Corporate Law : The order highlights that delayed applications, late progress reports, and non-compliance with filing requirements amounted to ser...
IBBI disciplinary order against Insolvency Professional Mr. Manish Kumar Gupta for regulatory violations in CIRP cases, highlighting adherence to timelines and regulations.
IBBI suspends insolvency professional Amar Gopal Gambhir for 2 years over delayed Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process. Full details of the order here.
IBBI suspends insolvency professional Rakesh Kumar Gupta for one year due to errors in creditor handling, delays and procedural violations under IBC.
NCLAT Delhi held that electricity supply by NPCL, being in nature of supply of essential goods, was necessary to be continued during the period of moratorium (CIRP period).
Explore the pros and cons of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016. Understand its impact on insolvency proceedings in India.
NCLT Chennai held that once the resolution plan is approved by Committee of Creditors, only limited judicial review is available for the Adjudicating Authority u/s. 30(2) and Section 31 of IBC, 2016 and this Adjudicating Authority cannot venture into the commercial aspects of the decisions taken by the Committee of Creditors.
Supreme Court held that a holding company and its subsidiary are always distinct legal entities and hence assets of the subsidiary company of the corporate debtor cannot be part of the resolution plan of the corporate debtor.
IBBIs recent order finds Vijaykumar Varun in violation of Insolvency Code provisions. Read details on non-compliance and disciplinary actions taken.
NCLT Bengaluru held that ‘right fees’ for which operational creditor (BCCI) is liable to be paid by Corporate Debtor (BYJU’s) falls within the definition of ‘operational debt’ within section 5(21) of the Code. Hence, petition filed u/s 9 to initiate CIRP accepted.
ITAT Delhi held that written off of obsolete inventory allowable as prepared in accordance with accounting standards and duly got prepared audited report of an independent auditor.
