Access significant and up-to-date high court judgments for legal insights and precedent. Stay informed about the latest legal decisions and their impact on various areas of law.
Corporate Law : Bombay HC held that a 21-year-old woman cannot be compelled to return home or marry against her wishes, treating residence, marria...
Corporate Law : The Madhya Pradesh High Court held that judicial officers cannot be intimidated for delivering judgments since every judicial orde...
Corporate Law : The article argues that failure to comply before the AO or CIT(A) can lead to adverse assessments, as higher forums generally cann...
Corporate Law : The Bombay High Court held that merely organising protests or morchas against government decisions cannot justify externment. It r...
Corporate Law : The Delhi High Court held that an unnatural death in police custody attracts constitutional liability under Article 21, even if ca...
Corporate Law : The Supreme Court upheld joint insolvency proceedings against two interconnected real estate companies due to common management an...
Corporate Law : Supreme Court ruled that CoC and RP can surrender financially burdensome assets voluntarily, clarifying moratorium under section 1...
Income Tax : Gujarat HC has directed CBDT to ensure that there is a mandatory one-month gap between date for furnishing tax audit reports (unde...
Income Tax : Rajasthan High Court granted a one-month extension for filing TARs under Section 44AB for AY 2025-26, citing delayed audit utility...
Income Tax : The Gujarat High Court is hearing a petition from the Chartered Accountants Association regarding persistent glitches on the new I...
Income Tax : Delhi HC upheld a Section 69C addition for unexplained capitation fee, holding that no credible evidence established its source an...
Income Tax : Gujarat HC held that Section 80P(4) does not bar Section 80P(2)(d) deduction on interest earned by a cooperative society from inve...
Corporate Law : Gauhati HC held that transportation of manufactured tea is not exempt under Entry 21(a), as Section 65B(5) governs the meaning of ...
Goods and Services Tax : Delhi HC directed processing of GST refund with interest, holding that appellate orders must be implemented unless stayed by a com...
Goods and Services Tax : Delhi HC held that GST refund cannot be withheld merely due to a proposed appeal, directed release of refund with interest, and tr...
Income Tax : The Court held that membership cannot be granted where the underlying flats do not exist and are merely refuge areas. It ruled tha...
Corporate Law : Bombay High Court implements "Rules for Video Conferencing 2022" for all courts in Maharashtra, Goa, and union territories, effect...
Income Tax : CBDT raises monetary limits for tax appeals: Rs. 60 lakh for ITAT, Rs. 2 crore for High Court, and Rs. 5 crore for Supreme Court, ...
Corporate Law : The Delhi High Court mandates new video conferencing protocols to enhance transparency and accessibility in court proceedings. Rea...
Income Tax : Income Tax Department Issues Instructions for Assessing Officers after Adverse Observations of Hon. Allahabad High Court in in Civ...
Delhi High Court held that Explanation 2 was inserted in Section 37 via Finance (No.2) Act, 2004 and is effective from 01.04.2015 [from Assessment Year 2015-2016 onwards] Accordingly expenditure incurred towards Corporate Social Responsibility is allowable as deduction u/s 37 of the Income Tax Act.
HC set aside order confirming excess claim of ITC) passed by Assistant Commissioner (ST) on the ground that the Petitioner was not granted fair opportunity of hearing.
As per prosecution case, some unknown persons entered into the house of the informant and told that they are Income Tax Officials and thereafter they started searching his house. The accused persons took away rupees twenty lacs alongwith gold jwellery.
Allahabad High Court held that rejection of claim of input tax credit on cryptic findings cannot be sustained. Accordingly, matter remanded to first Appellate Authority to record specific finding.
HC held that it is clear that there is no record to suggest that the procedure contemplated u/s 148A of the Act were followed before issuing notice under Section 148
Notice under Section 148 of the Act pertaining to the Assessment Year (AY) 2013-14 was issued on 30th March 2021, i.e., prior to 1st April 2021. Also, it was beyond the period of six years after the expiry of the AY in question
Explore Apar Industries vs Union of India case in Bombay High Court. Petition on transition and distribution of CENVAT Credit. Key details and court directives.
Madras High Court has allowed withdrawal request of the petitioner in the Writ of Declaration filed in order to declare the demand order issued against the petitioner quashed in view of the resolution plan
Patna High Court held that ex parte order passed without assigning any reasons sufficient even decipherable from the record is liable to be set aside as passed in violation of the principles of natural justice.
R. K. Copper and Alloy LLP Vs Union of India (Bombay High Court) Applications for refund of IGST and duty drawback on export of Goods. However, on the ground that some investigation is pending, the applications were not processed. The Hon’ble High Court referred to Circular dated 23/01/2020, Press release dated 29/10/2017 and Circular No. […]
