Understand the Goods and Services Tax (GST) and its impact on businesses. Learn about GST rates, compliance requirements, and its role in simplifying taxation. Stay updated with the latest GST news and updates.
Goods and Services Tax : The Court ruled that limitation under Section 54 cannot bar refund of mistakenly paid GST. It held that excess tax collected witho...
Goods and Services Tax : Explains why liquidated damages are generally not subject to GST unless linked to a supply. Highlights the importance of distingui...
Goods and Services Tax : The Court ruled that ITC on GIDC charges is allowable where no construction is involved. It also held that Section 74 proceedings ...
CA, CS, CMA : The update discusses GST rulings on ITC and refunds, income tax relief interpretations, and insolvency reforms. It also covers dis...
Goods and Services Tax : The court held that recovery cannot proceed against a legal heir without determining liability under Section 93, reinforcing due p...
Goods and Services Tax : The representation highlights ambiguity in whether the ₹2.5 crore ITC threshold should be annual or cumulative. It emphasizes th...
Goods and Services Tax : Authorities arrested the key accused for orchestrating fake ITC claims and fictitious export transactions. The case highlights str...
Goods and Services Tax : Authorities uncovered fraudulent ITC claims exceeding ₹8 crore without actual supply of goods. The ruling highlights that ITC is...
Goods and Services Tax : The case highlights that summons lacking details of the underlying inquiry violate procedural fairness. It underscores the need fo...
Goods and Services Tax : CBI arrested GST officials for demanding a bribe to facilitate registration approval. The case highlights strict enforcement again...
Goods and Services Tax : The court refused to entertain a constitutional challenge raised to bypass limitation. It allowed filing of appeal with delay cond...
Goods and Services Tax : The court declined to examine the constitutional validity of Section 16(2)(c) in absence of clear factual basis. It held that disp...
Goods and Services Tax : The court addressed denial of input tax credit due to mismatch with GSTR-2A and missing invoices. It allowed the taxpayer to seek ...
Goods and Services Tax : The court held that an adjudication order passed without considering the taxpayer’s reply is unsustainable. It remitted the matt...
Goods and Services Tax : The Court held that a single show cause notice covering multiple assessment years is not legally sustainable. Authorities were per...
Goods and Services Tax : The GST portal launches an Excel-based IMS Offline Tool to help taxpayers efficiently manage and process invoices. It enables bulk...
Goods and Services Tax : CBIC extends due date for filing March 2026 GSTR-3B to April 21, 2026, for registered persons under Section 39 of the CGST Act....
Goods and Services Tax : GSTN clarified that system-calculated interest for February 2026 was incorrectly reflected in March returns due to a technical iss...
Goods and Services Tax : GSTN has enabled editing of the pre-deposit percentage in APL-01 filings. The change allows taxpayers flexibility, while verificat...
Goods and Services Tax : Taxpayers faced issues filing appeals where adjudication orders showed zero demand. GSTN clarified that such system limitations re...
Textile company cannot claim input tax credit of GST charged by the Medical/ Health Insurance Company in respect of insurance done for employees
In re Uttarakhand Purv Sainik Kalyan Nigam Ltd. (GST AAR Uttarakhand) On perusal of legal provisions of Section 51 of CGST Act, 2017, we find that the Government has authorized following persons , to deduct tax at the rate of two per cent (1% CGST + 1% SGST) from the value of supply excluding the central […]
Tata Motors had approached the Gujarat bench of AAR seeking a ruling on whether Goods and Services Tax (GST) is applicable on the nominal amount recovered by it from employees for the usage of canteen facility and whether input tax credit (ITC) is available on GST charged by the service provider on the canteen facility provided to employees working in the factory.
Authority has rightly observed that, in the case of transportation of passengers, the recipient of service would be the passenger whereas in the case of renting any motor vehicle, like buses in the subject case, the recipient would not be the passenger.
Clarification regarding extension of time limit to apply for revocation of cancellation of registration in view of Notification No. 34/2021-CT dated 29.08.2021 Government has issued Circular No. 158/14/2021-GST dated 06.09.2021 in order to clarify circumstances in which benefit of Notification No.34/2021-CT dated 29.08.2021 would be available Notification No. 34/2021-CT dated 29.08.2021 was issued to extend […]
45th GST COUNCIL MEETING TO BE HELD ON 17TH SEPTEMBER 2021 The 45th meeting of the GST Council is scheduled to be held on 17th September 2021 at Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh under the chairpersonship of Hon’ble Finance Minister Smt. Nirmala Sitharaman. The GST council would be holding physical meeting after a gap of 16 months. […]
INTRODUCTION:- The aim of Indian government is to increasing the output and quality of export from India in pursuance to the “Make in India” policy. Indian government also provide the many incentives to the exporters which are explain below. WHAT IS EXPORT INCENTIVES:- Export incentives are certain benefits exporters receive from the government as acknowledgement […]
Sahayta Security Services Pvt Ltd, Vs Asst. Commissioner State Tax & (GST Appellate Authority, Himachal Pradesh) GST Appellate Authority revokes cancellation of GSTIN as It is made clear in the section 107 (7) that after amount of pre deposit paid by appellant, recovery proceeding for balance amount shall deemed to be stayed. Issue involved: Revocation […]
In Amit Haresh Kumar Mehta v. Senior Intelligence Officer, DGGI [Cr. M. A. No. 1486/2021 dated August 11, 2021], Amit Haresh Kumar Mehta (the Applicant) has filed the current application seeking an Anticipatory Bail under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (the Cr.P.C). The Senior Intelligence Officer, DGGI (“the Respondent) has contended […]
The Petitioner counsel contested that the Respondent No. 3, in most arbitrary manner and without application of mind, has passed the impugned order dated March 26, 2021 in complete violation of Principles of Natural Justice.
