Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Anathi Hanumegowda Vijay Kumar Vs ITO (ITAT Bangalore)
Related Assessment Year : 2017-18
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Anathi Hanumegowda Vijay Kumar Vs ITO (ITAT Bangalore) Wrong PAN, Wrong Addition: ITAT Deletes ₹2.35 Crore Addition Made on Area Manager for Company’s Bank Account Transactions The Bangalore ITAT granted relief to an employee of Manappuram Finance Ltd. after finding that cash deposits of ₹2.35 crore were wrongly attributed to him merely because the bank had reported his PAN in the Statement of Financial Transactions (SFT), even though the bank account belonged to the company. The assessee was treated as a non-filer and reassessment proceedings were initiated based on information that ₹...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

ESOP Discount Is Allowable Business Deduction, Not Contingent Liability: ITAT Mumbai Reassessment Quashed for Approval by Wrong Authority Under Section 151(ii): ITAT Mumbai Section 10(10D): Should Life Insurance Exemption Cover Entire Maturity Proceeds or Only Income? Section 68 Addition on Loans From Wife and Company Deleted: Delhi ITAT Section 271D Penalty Quashed as Six-Month Limitation Expired: Bengaluru ITAT View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
July 2026
M T W T F S S
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
2728293031