Company Law : The submission of MSME-1 is not only a requirement of the Companies Act, but it also has implications on the Income Tax Act and af...
Company Law : Learn the consequences of not filing MSME Form 1 on time as illustrated by a recent penalty case. Understand the legal requirement...
Company Law : Delve into the conundrum surrounding Section 42(7) of the Companies Act 2013 as the ROC Delhi's adjudication order highlights the ...
Company Law : Explore the game-changing Companies (Listing of Equity Shares in Permissible Jurisdictions) Rules, 2024, paving the way for Indian...
Company Law : Explore penalty order under Sec. 135 of Companies Act, 2013 on AECOM India for CSR non-compliance. Learn consequences, key takeawa...
Company Law : MCA imposes ₹50,000 penalty on Xinpoming Technology for non-filing of DIR-3 KYC under Rule 12A. Appeal can be filed within 60 da...
Company Law : Penalty imposed on Sh. Laxit Awla under Section 165 of Companies Act, 2013, for exceeding directorship limits. Details on violatio...
Corporate Law : Delhi High Court refuses interim relief against NFRA penalties imposed on CAs and CA firm in the Reliance Capital audit lapses cas...
Company Law : ROC Pune held that procedural lapses in a private placement involving one investor formed part of a single integrated transaction ...
Company Law : ROC Pune penalized a start-up company and its officers for delayed filing of e-Form MGT-14 relating to a Special Resolution under ...
Company Law : ROC Pune penalized a company and its directors for delayed filing of e-Form PAS-3 relating to private placement allotment under Se...
Company Law : ROC Pune penalized a company and its directors for utilizing private placement funds before filing return of allotment under Secti...
Company Law : ROC Mumbai-II imposed penalty under Section 450 after a company incorrectly mentioned the AGM date in Form AOC-4 XBRL. The order h...
Discover penalty imposed by MCA on Resonance Eduventures Limited for failing to appoint independent directors, as per Companies Act 2013. Learn about violation, penalties, and implications.
Dive into the appeal under Companies Act, 2013 by Vaasudev Grain Mill Pvt Ltd. Learn about penalties, Covid-19 challenges, and the final resolution by the Regional Director.
As per the provisions of Section 10A(1), a newly incorporated company with share capital must file a declaration within 180 days of incorporation, confirming that every subscriber to the memorandum has paid the value of the shares agreed upon. The company also needs to verify its registered office details. However, Vena Energy Aura Private Limited failed to fulfill these requirements.
Company failed to appoint a Whole Time Company Secretary within the required timeframe of six months, as per the provisions of Section 203(1) of the Act. The company eventually appointed a Whole Time Company Secretary with a delay of 140 days. This delay resulted in a violation of Section 203(1) and rendered the company and its officers liable under Section 203(5).
Company failed to attach a complete copy of the Director’s Report and Auditor’s Report for financial year 2019-20, resulting in violation of Section 134 & 137 of Companies Act.
Violation of Section 135(6) of Companies Act, 2013 by M/S. Kony India Private Limited as company failed to transfer an unspent amount of Rs. 42,09,263/- to the Unspent Corporate Social Responsibility Account within the specified time frame. The company has since transferred the amount, but a penalty has been imposed. The penalty for the company […]
Read about the penalties imposed on Nature Gold Nidhi Limited for non-compliance with the Companies Act, 2013. Learn about the violations, fines, and the appeal process
MCA Imposes Penalty of Rs. 14,00,000 for non-submission of Balance Sheet in Uttar Pradesh. Learn about the case & the subsequent penalties in this post.
Discover the outcome of an appeal under section 454(5) of the Companies Act, 2013 for default in appointing a Company Secretary, where the penalty was reduced to Rs. 1.25 Lakh.
Section 152(3) of Companies Act, 2013, mandate that an individual cannot be appointed as director unless allocated a DIN as per Section 154