Company Law : The submission of MSME-1 is not only a requirement of the Companies Act, but it also has implications on the Income Tax Act and af...
Company Law : Learn the consequences of not filing MSME Form 1 on time as illustrated by a recent penalty case. Understand the legal requirement...
Company Law : Delve into the conundrum surrounding Section 42(7) of the Companies Act 2013 as the ROC Delhi's adjudication order highlights the ...
Company Law : Explore the game-changing Companies (Listing of Equity Shares in Permissible Jurisdictions) Rules, 2024, paving the way for Indian...
Company Law : Explore penalty order under Sec. 135 of Companies Act, 2013 on AECOM India for CSR non-compliance. Learn consequences, key takeawa...
Company Law : MCA imposes ₹50,000 penalty on Xinpoming Technology for non-filing of DIR-3 KYC under Rule 12A. Appeal can be filed within 60 da...
Company Law : Penalty imposed on Sh. Laxit Awla under Section 165 of Companies Act, 2013, for exceeding directorship limits. Details on violatio...
Corporate Law : Delhi High Court refuses interim relief against NFRA penalties imposed on CAs and CA firm in the Reliance Capital audit lapses cas...
Company Law : ROC Pune held that procedural lapses in a private placement involving one investor formed part of a single integrated transaction ...
Company Law : ROC Pune penalized a start-up company and its officers for delayed filing of e-Form MGT-14 relating to a Special Resolution under ...
Company Law : ROC Pune penalized a company and its directors for delayed filing of e-Form PAS-3 relating to private placement allotment under Se...
Company Law : ROC Pune penalized a company and its directors for utilizing private placement funds before filing return of allotment under Secti...
Company Law : ROC Mumbai-II imposed penalty under Section 450 after a company incorrectly mentioned the AGM date in Form AOC-4 XBRL. The order h...
MCA imposes penalty under section 378ZA(10) of section 378ZA(10) of Companies Act, 2013 as company failed to file proceedings of the annual general meeting, along with report of Board of Directors, audited balance sheet, and profit and loss statements.
Company had issued a private placement offer letter before filing the relevant special resolution in the registry, which is a violation of Section 42(3) of the Companies Act, 2013, read with Rule 14(8) of the Companies (Prospectus and Allotment of Securities) Rules, 2014.
The Registrar of Companies (ROC) in Delhi has recently imposed penalties on a company, including its Independent Directors (ID) and Non-Executive Directors (NED), for violations related to the Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) provisions under Section 135(5) of the Companies Act, 2013. The case involves the company’s failure to spend the required amount on CSR activities […]
KMPs who did not hold Board positions would not be liable under section 135. But all the directors as on that relevant date would be liable on account of the failure to discharge an obligation cast upon them by the law.
ROC Hyderabad penalizes Thrissur Expressway Limited and its officers Rs. 3.75 Lakhs for not appointing an internal auditor, violating Section 138 of Companies Act.
Thrissur Expressway Limited fined Rs. 30,33,200 for delays in appointing key managerial personnel as per Section 203 of the Companies Act, 2013.
Order against Violation of Section 189 read with Section 188 of the Companies Act, 2013 by M/s. Adani Power Limited- The order states that an inquiry was conducted by the Office of the Registrar of Companies, Ahmedabad, based on a directive from the Ministry of Corporate Affairs. During the inquiry, it was found that the company […]
The violation of Section 42 of the Companies Act, 2013 pertains to the non-compliance of regulations regarding private placement of shares by a company. In this specific case, M/s. Payswiff Technologies Private Limited failed to adhere to the provisions of Section 42(6) of the Act, which requires the company to keep the funds received for […]
Penalty for non-filing of Form MGT-14 is imposed under Section 117(2) of the Companies Act, 2013. The section states that if a company fails to file the resolution or agreement specified in sub-section (1) within the specified period, it will be liable to a penalty of ten thousand rupees.
Learn about the penalty imposed by the MCA on a CFO for violating company law by holding office in more than one company. Detailed analysis and implications provided.
