Company Law : The submission of MSME-1 is not only a requirement of the Companies Act, but it also has implications on the Income Tax Act and af...
Company Law : Learn the consequences of not filing MSME Form 1 on time as illustrated by a recent penalty case. Understand the legal requirement...
Company Law : Delve into the conundrum surrounding Section 42(7) of the Companies Act 2013 as the ROC Delhi's adjudication order highlights the ...
Company Law : Explore the game-changing Companies (Listing of Equity Shares in Permissible Jurisdictions) Rules, 2024, paving the way for Indian...
Company Law : Explore penalty order under Sec. 135 of Companies Act, 2013 on AECOM India for CSR non-compliance. Learn consequences, key takeawa...
Company Law : MCA imposes ₹50,000 penalty on Xinpoming Technology for non-filing of DIR-3 KYC under Rule 12A. Appeal can be filed within 60 da...
Company Law : Penalty imposed on Sh. Laxit Awla under Section 165 of Companies Act, 2013, for exceeding directorship limits. Details on violatio...
Corporate Law : Delhi High Court refuses interim relief against NFRA penalties imposed on CAs and CA firm in the Reliance Capital audit lapses cas...
Company Law : ROC Pune held that procedural lapses in a private placement involving one investor formed part of a single integrated transaction ...
Company Law : ROC Pune penalized a start-up company and its officers for delayed filing of e-Form MGT-14 relating to a Special Resolution under ...
Company Law : ROC Pune penalized a company and its directors for delayed filing of e-Form PAS-3 relating to private placement allotment under Se...
Company Law : ROC Pune penalized a company and its directors for utilizing private placement funds before filing return of allotment under Secti...
Company Law : ROC Mumbai-II imposed penalty under Section 450 after a company incorrectly mentioned the AGM date in Form AOC-4 XBRL. The order h...
Registrar of Companies in Rajasthan fines M/s STARNET BREEDING AND RESEARCH FARMS PRIVATE LIMITED and its directors for failing to comply with section 118 of Companies Act, 2013 read with SS-2 regarding minutes of annual general meetings.
Indira IVF Hospital Private Limited, along with key officers, recently underwent an adjudication process for failing to appoint internal auditors as mandated by Section 138 of the Companies Act, 2013. This article provides a detailed analysis of the violation, the arguments presented, and the penalty imposed by the Registrar of Companies, Rajasthan, Jaipur. The case […]
MCA imposed penalties n Gujarat Chinese Enterprises for failing to file e-form INC-20A within due date. A comprehensive breakdown of legal procedures, penalties, and its implications
Registrar of Companies in Rajasthan imposes a 5 Lakh penalty on Axtron Texchem (India) Private Limited and its directors for delaying filing of Form DIR-12 related to director resignations.
Discover why no penalty was imposed for failure to file Form DIN-3 in Rajasthan. Get insights into Companies Act, 2013 violation case, and registrar’s decision
The breach relates to the absence of signatures from any directors on the company’s Balance Sheet for the fiscal year ending March 31, 2021. Following a hearing, penalties were levied: the company was fined Rs. 3,00,000, while each director, Mr. Veerendra Kumar Vishwakarma and Ms. Neelam Gautam, faced fines of Rs. 50,000 each.
Explore implications of violating Section 12(3) of the Companies Act, 2013. Delve into an order under section 454 and penalties imposed for non-compliance.
Learn about the penalty imposed on LOIN TECHNOLOGY PRIVATE LIMITED under Section 134(1) of the Companies Act, 2013, by the Registrar of Companies, Madhya Pradesh.
Registrar of Companies in Rajasthan fines M/s EMBASSY INFRATECH INDIA LIMITED and its directors a total of 9 lakh rupees for failing to conduct minimum required four board meetings annually, violating Section 173 of Companies Act, 2013
Registrar of Companies in Rajasthan fines M/s EMBASSY INFRATECH INDIA LIMITED and its directors for violating Section 119 of Companies Act, 2013 by not maintaining meeting records due to non-existence of registered office
