Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : TO CUM PDO Panchkula Vs ITO TDS (ITAT Delhi)
Related Assessment Year : 2015-16
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.

TO CUM PDO Panchkula Vs ITO TDS (ITAT Delhi)

Time-Bar Kills 201 Proceedings: ITAT Delhi Quashes TDS Demand on Treasury Office- Date of Knowledge Irrelevant: Delay Fatal to 201(1) Action, Demand Deleted

Assessee, a Government Treasury Office under Haryana Govt., was treated as assessee-in-default u/s 201(1) & 201(1A) following a survey u/s 133A(2A) on 04.02.2020. AO passed order dated 11.03.2022 for AY 2016-17 determining alleged short deduction of ₹7,49,749 & interest of ₹26,17,555. CIT(A) dismissed the appeal ex-parte without considering assesse

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

PCIT-263 Upheld for Inadequate Inquiry in Search Assessment: ITAT Mumbai Section 69C Not Invokable: ITAT Mumbai Dismisses Revenue Appeal in Bogus 80GGC Case Section 54 Deduction Allowed Even If Original Return Was Not Filed: ITAT Mumbai No Section 271AAA Penalty Where Search Disclosure Was Proper: ITAT Kolkata Bogus Purchases: ITAT Mumbai Restricts Addition to 5% Where Sales Are Undisputed View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Ads Free tax News and Updates
Search Post by Date
January 2026
M T W T F S S
 1234
567891011
12131415161718
19202122232425
262728293031