Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Het Ram Vs Assessment Unit (ITAT Delhi)
Related Assessment Year : 2018-19
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.

Het Ram Vs Assessment Unit (ITAT Delhi)

Jurisdiction Error in Form 36 Proves Fatal— Technical Lapse in Form 36 Sends Entire Litigation to Another Bench

Assessee filed four appeals-against reassessment u/s 147 r.w.s. 144, penalty u/s 270A, penalty u/s 272A & penalty u/s 271B-before ITAT Delhi. At the outset, assessee submitted a written request stating that the appeals were filed in the wrong Bench due to an inadvertent error in Form 36, where the jurisdictional officer was mistakenly mentioned as an “Assessment Unit” in Delhi. Because of this incor

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Income Tax Appeals Dismissed Due to NCLT Moratorium Against Personal Guarantors Unsecured Loans Through Banking Channels Accepted; Section 68 Addition of ₹2.87 Cr Deleted On-Money Addition for Flat Purchase Deleted; Builder’s General Statement Alone Not Enough Bogus Purchase Cases: Only Profit Element Taxable; 4% GP Addition Upheld on ₹5.79 Cr Purchases Recorded Sales Cannot Be Taxed Again u/s 68; Additions Based Only on Third-Party Statement Deleted View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Ads Free tax News and Updates
Search Post by Date
January 2026
M T W T F S S
 1234
567891011
12131415161718
19202122232425
262728293031