Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Priyanka Sandeep Runwal Vs DCIT (ITAT Mumbai)
Related Assessment Year : 2014-15
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Priyanka Sandeep Runwal Vs DCIT (ITAT Mumbai) Firestar / Nirav Modi ‘On-Money’ Theory Fails Again: ITAT Mumbai Deletes Cash-Jewellery Additions for Want of Cross-Examination & Corroboration ITAT Mumbai (C Bench) in Priyanka Sandeep Runwal vs DCIT, Central Circle-4(1) (ITA Nos. 6524, 6522 & 6523/Mum/2024; AYs 2014-15, 2015-16 & 2016-17; order dated 23.12.2025) has allowed all three appeals, deleting additions made as unexplained expenditure on alleged cash (“on-money”) purchase of jewellery from the Nirav Modi / Firestar Group. The reassessments u/s 147 were triggered solely...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

SC Slams Casual Sanction of ₹8 Cr Loan After Borrower Defaults From Day One Inheritance Isn’t a Birthright When a Valid Will Exists: SC Interest on Bank Deposits Can Still Qualify for 80P Deduction- Bangalore ITAT Gives Relief to Credit Co-operative Society SC: Interest on Borrowed Funds Allowed Even for Investment Through Group Concerns – Commercial Expediency Prevails Penalty for Unsecured Loans Not Automatic Merely for Section 68 Addition: ITAT Bangalore View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Ads Free tax News and Updates
Search Post by Date
May 2026
M T W T F S S
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031