Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Ashish Mansukhlal Gokani Mithapur Vs CIT (Appeals) (ITAT Rajkot)
Related Assessment Year : 2013-14
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Ashish Mansukhlal Gokani Mithapur Vs CIT (Appeals) (ITAT Rajkot) AY 2013-14 Beyond Limitation-  Jurisdictional Defect Fatal: Wrong Sanction & Late 148 Notice Void the Reassessment Assessee filed return declaring Rs.1,85,850/-. Based on Insight-Portal information regarding total bank credits of Rs.1,61,84,806/-, AO reopened assessment u/s 147 & completed reassessment u/s 144/147 on 29.03.2022, treating Rs.70,38,117/- as unexplained credits u/s 68. CIT(A)/NFAC partly sustained addition at Rs.7,49,971/-. Before Tribunal, Assessee challenged the legality of reopening. Tribunal examined th...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

SC Slams Casual Sanction of ₹8 Cr Loan After Borrower Defaults From Day One Inheritance Isn’t a Birthright When a Valid Will Exists: SC Interest on Bank Deposits Can Still Qualify for 80P Deduction- Bangalore ITAT Gives Relief to Credit Co-operative Society SC: Interest on Borrowed Funds Allowed Even for Investment Through Group Concerns – Commercial Expediency Prevails Penalty for Unsecured Loans Not Automatic Merely for Section 68 Addition: ITAT Bangalore View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Ads Free tax News and Updates
Search Post by Date
May 2026
M T W T F S S
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031