Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Pagadala Velugonda Reddy Vs ACIT (ITAT Raipur)
Related Assessment Year : 2013-14
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Pagadala Velugonda Reddy Vs ACIT (ITAT Raipur) VSVS for Penalty ≠ VSVS for Quantum— CIT(A)’s Mistaken Assumption on VSVS Leads to Full Remand   Assessee, a senior citizen deriving agricultural income & not originally required to file return for AY 2013-14, faced reassessment completed ex-parte u/s 147 r.w.s.144 with addition of Rs.19,20,000 treating entire cash deposits as unexplained investment u/s 69. Before CIT(A)-NFAC, Assessee filed detailed submissions & evidence; however, CIT(A) dismissed appeal presuming Assessee had opted for settlement of quantum dispute under Vivad Se...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

SC Slams Casual Sanction of ₹8 Cr Loan After Borrower Defaults From Day One Inheritance Isn’t a Birthright When a Valid Will Exists: SC Interest on Bank Deposits Can Still Qualify for 80P Deduction- Bangalore ITAT Gives Relief to Credit Co-operative Society SC: Interest on Borrowed Funds Allowed Even for Investment Through Group Concerns – Commercial Expediency Prevails Penalty for Unsecured Loans Not Automatic Merely for Section 68 Addition: ITAT Bangalore View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Ads Free tax News and Updates
Search Post by Date
May 2026
M T W T F S S
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031