Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Pagadala Velugonda Reddy Vs ACIT (ITAT Raipur)
Related Assessment Year : 2013-14
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.

Pagadala Velugonda Reddy Vs ACIT (ITAT Raipur)

VSVS for Penalty ≠ VSVS for Quantum— CIT(A)’s Mistaken Assumption on VSVS Leads to Full Remand  

Assessee, a senior citizen deriving agricultural income & not originally required to file return for AY 2013-14, faced reassessment completed ex-parte u/s 147 r.w.s.144 with addition of Rs.19,20,000 treating entire cash deposits as unexplained investment u/s 69. Before CIT(A)-NFAC, Assessee filed detailed submissions & evidence; however, CIT(A) dismissed appeal presuming Assessee had opted for settleme

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Section 153C Notice Issued After 01.04.2021 Held Invalid Tax Authorities Cannot Sit in Judgment Over Commercial Share Valuation Section 69A Addition on Seized Cash Notings Quashed Penalty Deleted Where Income Already Disclosed and Taxed Twice Section 271AAA Penalty Deleted Where Search Disclosure Was Proper View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Ads Free tax News and Updates
Search Post by Date
January 2026
M T W T F S S
 1234
567891011
12131415161718
19202122232425
262728293031