Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Mithapur Nutan Bal Shikshan Sangh. Vs ITO (ITAT Rajkot)
Related Assessment Year : 2018-19
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Mithapur Nutan Bal Shikshan Sangh. Vs ITO (ITAT Rajkot) These four appeals relate to penalties u/s 270A & 271AAC(1). CIT(A)-NFAC had dismissed all penalty appeals as time-barred, refusing condonation of delay of about 503 days, &  therefore did not examine merits. Assessee explained detailed reasons for delay through affidavits, including trust-run school activities, administrative constraints & circumstances beyond control. Tribunal found that CIT(A) himself had condoned delay in the quantum appeal for AY 2019-20, &  had even set aside the quantum assessment directing AO to ...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

SC Slams Casual Sanction of ₹8 Cr Loan After Borrower Defaults From Day One Inheritance Isn’t a Birthright When a Valid Will Exists: SC Interest on Bank Deposits Can Still Qualify for 80P Deduction- Bangalore ITAT Gives Relief to Credit Co-operative Society SC: Interest on Borrowed Funds Allowed Even for Investment Through Group Concerns – Commercial Expediency Prevails Penalty for Unsecured Loans Not Automatic Merely for Section 68 Addition: ITAT Bangalore View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Ads Free tax News and Updates
Search Post by Date
May 2026
M T W T F S S
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031