Advertisement
Advertisement
Skip to content
Follow Us on
Advertisement
TOP STORIES
Income Tax

CIT(A) Condoned Quantum Delay but Not Penalty? ITAT Corrects the Inconsistency

Case Law Details

Case Name
Mithapur Nutan Bal Shikshan Sangh. Vs ITO (ITAT Rajkot)
Date of Judgement/Order
Only available for paid members
Related Assessment Year
2018-19
Advertisement Mithapur Nutan Bal Shikshan Sangh. Vs ITO (ITAT Rajkot) These four appeals relate to penalties u/s 270A & 271AAC(1). CIT(A)-NFAC had dismissed all penalty appeals as time-barred, refusing condonation of delay of about 503 days, &  therefore did not examine merits. Assessee explained detailed reasons for delay through affidavits, including trust-run school activities, administrative constraints & circumstances beyond control. Tribunal found that CIT(A) himself had condoned delay in the quantum appeal for AY 2019-20, &  had even set aside the quantum assessment...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
Advertisement

Author Info

CA Vijayakumar Shetty
Qualification: CA in Practice
Company: Shetty & Co, Chartered Accountants, Mangalore
Location: Mangalore, Karnataka
Articles Published: 5,940

Join TaxGuru's Network for the latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *