This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
CIT(A) Condoned Quantum Delay but Not Penalty? ITAT Corrects the Inconsistency
Case Law Details
- Case Name
- Mithapur Nutan Bal Shikshan Sangh. Vs ITO (ITAT Rajkot)
- Appeal Number
- Only available for paid members
- Date of Judgement/Order
- Only available for paid members
- Related Assessment Year
- 2018-19
- Courts
- All ITAT, ITAT Rajkot
Upgrade to Basic or Premium to download.
Already Upgraded? Log in.
Advertisement
Mithapur Nutan Bal Shikshan Sangh. Vs ITO (ITAT Rajkot)
These four appeals relate to penalties u/s 270A & 271AAC(1). CIT(A)-NFAC had dismissed all penalty appeals as time-barred, refusing condonation of delay of about 503 days, & therefore did not examine merits. Assessee explained detailed reasons for delay through affidavits, including trust-run school activities, administrative constraints & circumstances beyond control. Tribunal found that CIT(A) himself had condoned delay in the quantum appeal for AY 2019-20, & had even set aside the quantum assessment...






