Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Mithapur Nutan Bal Shikshan Sangh. Vs ITO (ITAT Rajkot)
Related Assessment Year : 2018-19
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.

Mithapur Nutan Bal Shikshan Sangh. Vs ITO (ITAT Rajkot)

These four appeals relate to penalties u/s 270A & 271AAC(1). CIT(A)-NFAC had dismissed all penalty appeals as time-barred, refusing condonation of delay of about 503 days, &  therefore did not examine merits. Assessee explained detailed reasons for delay through affidavits, including trust-run school activities, administrative constraints & circumstances beyond control. Tribunal found that CIT(A) himself had condoned delay in the quantum appeal for AY 2019-20, &  had even set aside the quantu

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

PCIT-263 Upheld for Inadequate Inquiry in Search Assessment: ITAT Mumbai Section 69C Not Invokable: ITAT Mumbai Dismisses Revenue Appeal in Bogus 80GGC Case Section 54 Deduction Allowed Even If Original Return Was Not Filed: ITAT Mumbai No Section 271AAA Penalty Where Search Disclosure Was Proper: ITAT Kolkata Bogus Purchases: ITAT Mumbai Restricts Addition to 5% Where Sales Are Undisputed View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Ads Free tax News and Updates
Search Post by Date
January 2026
M T W T F S S
 1234
567891011
12131415161718
19202122232425
262728293031