The Supreme Court set aside the e-auction of a DDA plot by Corporation Bank, ruling the underlying mortgage was void ab initio for lacking the mandatory prior consent of the Lieutenant Governor.
Supreme Court reinforces that Section 269SS violation doesn’t invalidate a debt under the NI Act. It upheld conviction in Sanjabij Tari vs. Kishore Borcar, stressing presumptions under Sections 118 & 139.
The principal issue for determination was whether the segregation of the appellant’s trial and filing of a separate charge-sheet solely on account of his being an MLA was legally sustainable, given the statutory framework under CrPC and constitutional guarantees of fairness and equality.
Supreme Court held that High Court has rightly arrived to the conclusion that the levy of export duty on goods supplied from the Domestic Tariff Area [DTA] to the Special Economic Zone [SEZ] is not justified.
The case of assessee was that the assessments for these years were time-barred. It was urged that in view of the limitation prescribed under Section 19 of the Act, the authority concerned initially declared the assessments for all the years to be time-barred.
The Supreme Court of India has ordered the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) to probe the authenticity of a B.Com degree presented by an advocate, Naresh Dilawari, after Magadh University declared it to be forged. The court’s order follows a dispute where the degree’s veracity was challenged, leading to the CBI being tasked with investigating and submitting a report.
This summary outlines the Supreme Court’s analysis of a major land dispute, focusing on the legal arguments and judicial precedents concerning a government agency’s failure to file a timely appeal.
Supreme Court ruled that a sale deed executed without consent or consideration is void, and the plaintiff’s suit for possession is governed by Article 65 of the Limitation Act.
Supreme Court held that converting imported Gensets into Power Packs by adding essential components amounts to manufacture under Section 2(f). The process created a distinct, marketable product, making excise duty applicable.
The Supreme Court of India upholds the validity of consolidated GST Show Cause Notices (SCNs) for multiple financial years in fraudulent ITC claims.