Supreme Court of India

SC Guidelines on grant of bail to accused not arrested during investigation post filing of Chargesheet

Satender Kumar Antil Vs Central Bureau of Investigation and Anr. (Supreme Court of India)

Satender Kumar Antil Vs Central Bureau of Investigation and Anr. (Supreme Court of India) Hon’ble Supreme Court of India in the current application has issued guidelines relating to the aspect of grant of bail to accused who, on a charge sheet being filed is not arrested during investigation. Relying on the suggestions put forth by [&he...

SC defers hearing in Faceless Assessment Scheme for 3 Months

Central Board of Direct Taxes Vs Lakshya Budhiraja & Anr. (Supreme Court of India)

Central Board of Direct Taxes Vs Lakshya Budhiraja & Anr. (Supreme Court of India) SC recording of proceedings where Department submits proposal of change in faceless appeal scheme before Supreme Court in 3 months on account of provision relating to personal hearing. FULL TEXT OF THE SUPREME COURT JUDGMENT/ORDER Learned Additional Sol...

Mere Truthful Declaration of Criminal Cases cannot compel an Employer to Appoint a Candidate: SC

Union of India And Others Vs Methu Meda (Supreme Court of India)

Union of India And Others Vs Methu Meda (Supreme Court of India) Law is well ­settled. If a person is acquitted giving him the benefit of doubt, from the charge of an offence involving moral turpitude or because the witnesses turned hostile, it would not automatically entitle him for the employment, that too in disciplined […]...

Onus to Prove Deficiency in Service is on Complainant: SC

SGS India Ltd. Vs Dolphin International Ltd. (Supreme Court)

SGS India Ltd. Vs Dolphin International Ltd. (Supreme Court) The onus of proof of deficiency in service is on the complainant in the complaints under the Consumer Protection Act, 1986. It is the complainant who had approached the Commission, therefore, without any proof of deficiency, the opposite party cannot be held responsible for defi...

Judgment debtor cannot raise objections to executions in installments: SC

Dipali Biswas & Ors. Vs Nirmalendu Mukherjee (Supreme Court of India)

Dipali Biswas & Ors. Vs Nirmalendu Mukherjee (Supreme Court of India) (i) A judgment­ debtor cannot be allowed to raise objections as to the method of execution in instalments. After having failed to raise the issue in four earlier rounds of litigation, the appellants cannot be permitted to raise it now; (ii) As we have […]...

Mere Revenue Record is not A Document of Title & not create any right : SC

Prabhagiya Van Adhikari Awadh Van Prabhag Vs Arun Kumar Bhardwaj (Dead) Thr. Lrs (Supreme Court of India)

Prabhagiya Van Adhikari Awadh Van Prabhag Vs Arun Kumar Bhardwaj (Dead) Thr. Lrs (Supreme Court ) The revenue record is not a document of title. Therefore, even if the name of the lessee finds mention in the revenue record but such entry without any supporting documents of creation of lease contemplated under the Forest Act […]...

SC Stays payment of GST for grant of mining lease/royalty by petitioner

Lakhwinder Singh Vs Union of India (Supreme Court of India)

Lakhwinder Singh Vs Union of India (Supreme Court of India) 1 Issue notice. 2 Tag with SLP(C) No 37326 of 2017. 3 Until further orders, payment of GST for grant of mining lease/royalty by the petitioner shall remain stayed....

In a contempt jurisdiction, Court cannot travel beyond original judgment: SC

V. Senthur And Another Vs M. Vijayakumar (Supreme Court of India)

In a contempt jurisdiction, the court will not travel beyond the original judgment and direction; neither would it be permissible for the court to issue any  supplementary or incidental directions, which were not to be found in the original judgment....

Registration of Family Settlement Document Which Merely Records Past Transaction is not Compulsory: SC

Korukonda Chalapathi Rao & Anr. Vs Korukonda Annapurna Sampath Kumar (Supreme Court of India)

Korukonda Chalapathi Rao & Anr. Vs Korukonda Annapurna Sampath Kumar (Supreme Court of India) In the facts of this case, the contention of the appellants is that the Kharurunama dated 04.1986 merely sets out the arrangement arrived at between the brothers which is the family arrangement and it was a mere record of the past transacti...

Power of Attorney authorised by Financial Creditor Can File Application U/s 7 of IBC: SC

Rajendra Narottamdas Sheth & Anr Vs Chandra Prakash Jain (Supreme Court)

Rajendra Narottamdas Sheth & Anr Vs Chandra Prakash Jain (Supreme Court) In the present case, Mr. Praveen Kumar Gupta has been given general authorisation by the Bank with respect to all the business and affairs of the Bank, including commencement of legal proceedings before any court or tribunal with respect to any demand and filing ...

Browse All Categories

CA, CS, CMA (6,760)
Company Law (9,796)
Corporate Law (13,011)
Custom Duty (10,574)
DGFT (5,112)
Excise Duty (5,580)
Fema / RBI (5,652)
Finance (6,355)
Income Tax (48,794)
SEBI (5,245)
Service Tax (4,845)

Search Posts by Date

December 2023
M T W T F S S
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031