Soniya Gandhi Vs ACIT (Supreme Court of India) Supreme Court of India has allowed Income Tax Department to reopen tax case against Congress leaders Sonia Gandhi and Rahul Gandhi for A.Y. 2011-12 in connection with National Herald case. Hon’ble Supreme Court has held as follows:- “For certain reasons, it is not possible to take...

Council of the ICAI Vs Shri Gurvinder Singh & Anr. (Supreme Court of India) The Supreme Court observed that the chartered accountants can be proceeded against for their acts which bring disrepute to the profession whether or not related to his professional work. The bench comprising Justice Rohinton Fali Nariman and Justice Navin Sinh...

Sabha Shankar Dube Vs Divisional Forest Officer & Ors. (Supreme Court of India) The issue that was considered by this Court in Jagjit Singh (supra) is whether temporary employees (daily wage employees, ad hoc appointees, employees appointed on casual basis, contractual employees and likewise) are entitled to the minimum of the reg...

Sk. Tamisuddin Vs. Joy Joseph Creado & Anr. (Supreme Court of India) A complaint filed by the power of attorney would be maintainable in law. If that is so, the initial complaint filed by the appellant on behalf of Sairabee as the complainant would not be invalid in law as held by the High Court […]...

ITO Vs Urban Improvement Trust (Supreme Court of India) “The High Court based its decision on the fact that functions carried out by the assessee are statutory functions and it is carrying on the functions for the benefit of the State Government for urban development. The said reasoning cannot lead to the conclusion that it is [&hellip...

M/s. Supertech Ltd. Vs Rajni Goyal (Supreme Court) The Appellant – Builder inter alia submitted that – Possession of the flat was offered to the Respondent – Purchaser in December 2015 after obtaining the Completion Certificate for the building. Even though the Agreement provided for delivery of possession by 31.10.2013, the delay o...

(i) The crackers with reduced emission (improved crackers) and green crackers, as mentioned in Suggestion Nos. II and III above only would be permitted to be manufactured and sold. (ii) As a consequence, production and sale of crackers other than those mentioned in Suggestion Nos. II and III is hereby banned....

It is thus clear that since the Limitation Act is applicable to applications filed under Sections 7 and 9 of the Code from the inception of the Code, Article 137 of the Limitation Act gets attracted....

Arcelormittal India Private Limited Vs Satish Kumar Gupta & Ors. (Supreme Court of India)  Any person who wishes to submit a resolution plan, if he or it does so acting jointly, or in concert with other persons, which person or other persons happen to either manage or control or be promoters of a corporate debtor, […]...

Union of India Vs Mohit Mineral Pvt. Ltd. (Supreme Court of India) (1) Whether the Compensation to States Act, 2017 is beyond the legislative competence of Parliament? Ans. 1 -The Compensation to States Act, 2017 is not beyond the legislative competence of the Parliament. (2) Whether Compensation to States Act, 2017 violates Constitution ...