ITAT Delhi held that addition on the allegation of non-deduction of TDS unsustainable as AO failed to point out on which payments the assessee had not deducted TDS. Also, the claim of the assessee is supported by the certificate issued by the DDIT (Exemptions).
ITAT Delhi held that rule of consistency cannot be followed when the assessee has not discharged its onus and there is leakage of revenue.
Assessee company had entered into collaboration agreement for development of land and primarily the company was earning rental income. Thus, the interest paid for upcoming projects which was used to be rental has been rightly capitalized.
ITAT Delhi held that payment received from sale of software products/ licenses doesn’t fall in the nature of royalty as per Article 12(3) and as per section 9(1)(vi) and hence the same is not taxable in India.
ITAT Delhi held that penalty u/s 271AAA of the Income Tax Act is leviable when the assessee has accepted the additional/undisclosed income during the statement recorded u/s 132(4) of the Act.
ITAT Delhi held that as there is no gain of technical knowledge, experience or skill, the IT support service do not fall under the definition of FTS under Article 13 of the DTAA and hence TDS not deductible on the same.
ITAT Delhi held that income derived from the property held under the trust is wholly for a charitable purpose and hence exemption under section 11 of the Income Tax Act is allowable.
ITAT Delhi held that CRS, which was the source of revenue, was partially existent in the machines namely various computers installed at the premises of the subscribers. As assessee exercised complete control over the computers installed at premises of the subscribers. This amounted to a fixed place of business for carrying on the business of the enterprise in India.
Only because the ld Pr. CIT being a higher authority and more wiser in experience considered that enquiry in some other aspects would have resulted in different opinion, does not give jurisdiction to exercise revisional power u/s 263. That being so the grounds raised are allowed and the impugned order of revisional authority is set aside.
Harmeet Singh Vs ACIT (ITAT Delhi) In this case there is no dispute so far as the percentage of commission is concerned as the same has been accepted by the assessee during the search proceedings as well as during the assessment / appellate proceedings. The only point of concern is whether the assessee has actually […]
