ITAT Delhi held that disallowance of job work expenses in absence of any culpable evidence, merely on the standalone base of non-compliance of summons served u/s 131 of the Income Tax Act, is unsustainable in law.
ITAT Delhi held that approval granted under section 10(23C)(iv) of the Income Tax Act cannot be withdrawn on the allegation of violation of certain compliance conditions, once the threshold conditions is duly satisfied.
ITAT Delhi held that addition merely on the basis of bald statement under section 153A of the Income Tax Act without any incriminating material is unsustainable in law.
ITAT Delhi held that as per CBDT Instruction nos. 20/2015 and 5/2016 read with DGIT(Vigilance) letter dated 30th November, 2017 before venturing into other issues outside the scope of limited scrutiny, the Assessing Officer should have taken prior approval of PCIT/CIT. Failure of prior approval would render the assessment order bad in law.
CIT(A) erred in confirming addition of CSR expenses to book profit, when there is no such requirement to adjust the same while computing book profit as per section 115JB
ITAT held that payment would be deemed to have been made on date the cheque was handed over to banker and date of payment was to be taken as date of presentation of cheques by assessee.
Once TDS element is reflected in Form No. 26AS, the Assessing Officer cannot allege that the parties are not genuine. Moreover, full details are available on record.
Ajnara India Ltd. Vs ITO (ITAT Delhi) It is observed that the Ld. CIT(A) examined the Lease Deed Agreement between the assessee and NOIDA Authority filed before him during the appellate proceedings and extracted the relevant recitals in para 4.8 and 4.9 of his order to reach the conclusion that reading of Lease Deed Agreement, […]
Revenue is under obligation to give suitable credit for such deduction either in the year in which the corresponding income has been declared or in the year in which TDS credit has been received in the Treasury
Ace Datamatics Pvt. Ltd Vs ITO (ITAT Delhi) In the present case also the AO in para 4.2 of the assessment order observed that the payments received by Ambience group are split into two companies of same group on single contract one for rent and the other for maintenance charges. However, the AO noted that […]
