Analyzing the recent ITAT Delhi verdict in the Inter Globe Air Transport Vs ACIT case, highlighting the re-adjudication directive due to improper verification under Section 154 of the Income Tax Act.
Analysis of a significant case – Manohar Lal Sarraf and Sons Pvt Ltd Vs Pr. CIT, where ITAT Delhi overturned a revision order under Section 263 of the Income Tax Act due to lack of jurisdiction. Dive into the details of the ruling
ITAT Delhi partially approves the appeal by the assessee in Sudha Vs ITO, eliminating additional cash deposit sourced from past savings and agricultural activities.
In Raunika Fashion Pvt. Ltd. Vs ITO (ITAT Delhi) case, ITAT clarifies that Section 41(1) cannot be invoked when trading liabilities have not been written back in books of accounts.
ITAT Delhi’s ruling on Sentinel Consultants P. Ltd. vs ACIT addresses the due dates for PF-ESI contributions, aligning with the ESIC & PF Act over the Income Tax Act’s Mercantile System, impacting the assessment years 2018-19 and 2019-20.
ITAT Delhi held that the revenue itself is not very sure of the receipt of the cash nor there was any evidence. Accordingly, addition based on baseless allegation which cannot be proved is unsustainable.
ITAT Delhi held that plausible approach adopted by AO cannot be labeled as erroneous. Hence, revisionary order under section 263 of the Income Tax Act is unsustainable in law.
ITAT Delhi held that Tax Residency Certificate (TRC) is statutorily the only evidence required to be eligible for the benefit under the DTAA. Accordingly, benefit of India-Mauritius DTAA duly available.
ITAT noted that the explanations provided by the assessee concerning the withdrawals, deposits, and utilization of cash over time were satisfactory. The Tribunal acknowledged the Indian socio-economic constructs where holding cash, especially in rural society, is common.
Delhi ITAT asserts that mere transactions through a DMAT account or selling shares on stock exchange don’t necessarily rebut Section 68 of Income Tax Act. Understand the full implications of this ruling with our comprehensive analysis.
