Read the detailed analysis of DCIT Vs Bhanu Infrabuild Pvt Ltd (ITAT Delhi) case. No income tax addition if source of cash deposits during demonetization is proven.
Trak Services (P) Ltd. vs. ITO (ITAT Delhi) – Analysis of ITAT’s order deleting addition on sale consideration of shares. AO’s role and legal references discussed.
Detailed analysis of ITAT Delhi’s decision in the case of Tourism Finance Corporation of India Ltd. vs. ACIT regarding the allowability of expenditure for business expansion.
In a landmark decision, ITAT Delhi rules no penalty under 271(1)(c) for a bonafide assessee who revised and added interest income. Analysis of Pramila Tarneja Vs DCIT case.
ITAT Delhi held that the date of dispatch from the adjudicating officer is relevant for determining the limitation period. Accordingly, assessment order dispatched beyond time limit prescribed u/s. 153(1) is barred by limitation.
Read about ITAT Delhi’s directive to Assessing Officer to investigate TDS claims and PAN misuse in case of Legend Transport Solutions Pvt. Ltd. vs. ITO.
ITAT Delhi held that addition under section 68 towards unexplained income unsustainable as AO failed to consider leased land while assessing the agricultural income.
Explore the case of Raj Kumar Karanwal vs. PCIT (ITAT Delhi) and learn why exercise of revisionary jurisdiction by PCIT may not always be valid when issues have been examined by AO. Dive into the details of the case, the assessment process, and implications for taxpayers.
ITAT Delhi held that initiation of reassessment proceedings u/s 147 of the Income Tax Act merely on the basis of information from other officer without cogent and demonstrable material unjustified.
ITAT Delhi held that addition under section 68 of the Income Tax Act towards unexplained cash deposits unjustified as source of cash deposit successfully demonstrated by the assessee.
