Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : ACIT Vs Subhash Chand Jain (ITAT Delhi)
Related Assessment Year : 2015-16
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
ACIT Vs Subhash Chand Jain (ITAT Delhi) ITAT Delhi held that the revenue itself is not very sure of the receipt of the cash nor there was any evidence. Accordingly, addition based on baseless allegation which cannot be proved is unsustainable. Facts- AO disallowed 30% of the direct expense. AO held that the assessee has claimed direct expenses (Purchase of construction material) of Rs. 31,65,607/-. The assessee could not produce bills of the said expenditure nor the bank account details proving payment by cheque/RTGs. 30% of such expenditure is being disallowed u/s 40A(3). AO made addition of ...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Ads Free tax News and Updates
Search Post by Date
April 2026
M T W T F S S
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
27282930