Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : ACIT Vs Subhash Chand Jain (ITAT Delhi)
Related Assessment Year : 2015-16
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
ACIT Vs Subhash Chand Jain (ITAT Delhi) ITAT Delhi held that the revenue itself is not very sure of the receipt of the cash nor there was any evidence. Accordingly, addition based on baseless allegation which cannot be proved is unsustainable. Facts- AO disallowed 30% of the direct expense. AO held that the assessee has claimed direct expenses (Purchase of construction material) of Rs. 31,65,607/-. The assessee could not produce bills of the said expenditure nor the bank account details proving payment by cheque/RTGs. 30% of such expenditure is being disallowed u/s 40A(3). AO made addition of ...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
June 2026
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930