Delhi High Court’s ruling in Neena Wadhwa v. PCIT upholds the concurrent power of both the Jurisdictional Assessing Officer (JAO) and the Faceless Assessing Officer (FAO) to issue reassessment notices under Section 148, citing the binding precedent of T.K.S. Builders Pvt. Ltd..
Delhi High Court allows NALCO to file a delayed statutory appeal against a ₹32 lakh GST demand, citing inadvertent error and the ongoing Supreme Court challenge regarding Section 168A deadline extension notifications.
Delhi High Court rules that a Section 153C notice for AY 2010-11 was time-barred. Citing the RRJ Securities Ltd. precedent, the Court confirms the six-year block period for an “other person” must be calculated from the date documents are handed over to the AO, not the date of the original search.
The Delhi High Court quashed the retrospective GST cancellation of M/s Kansal Associates, whose sole proprietor died during the COVID-19 pandemic, ruling that the legal heir must be given a fresh opportunity to file a reply and receive a personal hearing on the Show Cause Notice.
Delhi HC rules FIRCs need not match exports transaction-wise for ITC claims. Total foreign remittance suffices; case remitted for fresh adjudication.
The Delhi High Court set aside a GST refund appeal order after finding a system error generated a personal hearing notice post-decision, violating natural justice.
The Delhi High Court disposed of a petition challenging a Rs. 1.51 crore GST demand, ruling that the petitioner must utilize the statutory appeal process under Section 107 of the CGST Act.
Delhi HC quashes ₹2.25 crore GST demand, citing a natural justice violation after the Adjudicating Authority denied an adjournment request and passed an ex-parte order.
Delhi High Court orders Income Tax Department to refund Rs. 5.10 crore with interest to Agilent Technologies for AY 2014-15, citing lack of justification for withholding.
Delhi High Court set aside a Rs.20 Cr GST demand, holding that ITC refund on exports cannot be denied if total foreign exchange proceeds are realized, even if FIRCs don’t match invoices transaction-by-transaction.
