The Delhi High Court found that further notices issued under Section 142(1) after the expiry of the statutory time limit were unlawful and ordered closure of reassessment proceedings.
The Delhi High Court set aside GST demands on Oriental Insurance Company Limited, applying CBIC Circular No. 228/22/2024-GST that regularized reinsurance services for the period from 1 July 2017 to 24 January 2018.
Delhi High Court set aside the Section 148A(3) reassessment order against Vedanta, ruling that subsequent GST Department closure of the underlying ITC issue materially affects the basis of escapement of income. The matter was remanded for a fresh decision incorporating the GST clean chit on the same transaction.
The Delhi High Court dismissed an appeal challenging the ITAT’s rejection of a rectification plea to recall an appeal order; the court found no mistake apparent on record and upheld the ITAT’s finding of no prejudice to the assessee.
The High Court set aside CESTAT’s remand orders, ruling that the legal challenge to DRI jurisdiction is resolved by the Supreme Court’s definitive judgment. The court condoned the substantial filing delay conditional on the deposit of ₹10,000/- in costs per appeal.
The Delhi High Court ruled that the Principal Additional Director General of DGGI is authorized to provisionally attach bank accounts under Section 83 of the CGST Act. The court referenced Notification No. 14/2017, equating the rank to a Principal Commissioner.
The Delhi High Court set aside the second Section 148 notice, ruling it was time-barred and constituted an illegal initiation of parallel reassessment proceedings.
The court directed implementation of an Order-in-Appeal allowing the release of gold upon payment of a reduced redemption fine and penalty of ₹35,000 each.
Delhi High Court held that bail application in GST fraudulent Input Tax Credit [ITC] matter is allowed since entire evidence has already been collected and there is little likelihood of tampering with evidence.
The Delhi High Court overturned a ₹19.79 lakh ex-parte GST assessment order, directing the Adjudicating Authority to rehear the case on merits. The ruling mandates that the Petitioner deposit the tax amount of ₹10.22 lakh and file a reply by the specified deadline.
