Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Neena Wadhwa Vs PCIT (Delhi High Court)
Related Assessment Year :
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Neena Wadhwa Vs PCIT (Delhi High Court) Neena Wadhwa filed a writ petition challenging reassessment proceedings initiated for AY 2017-18 through notice u/s 148A(b) dt 20.03.2024, followed by order u/s 148A(d) & consequential notice u/s 148, all issued by the Jurisdictional Assessing Officer (JAO) instead of the Faceless Assessing Officer (FAO). Petitioner contended that initiation of reassessment by the JAO violated the Faceless Assessment Scheme & Section 151A, as such actions can be undertaken only by the Faceless AO. The Division Bench noted that the issue stands squarely covered by...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Penny Stock Addition Fails: ITAT Says Suspicion Cannot Replace Evidence Borrowed Satisfaction: ITAT Quashes Penny Stock Additions in Multiple Family Cases Statement Alone Cannot Justify ‘On-Money’ Addition: ITAT Mumbai Genuine ITR Mistake Cannot Lead to Tax on Wrong Income: ITAT Mumbai AO Cannot Reopen on the Same Material Examined in U/s 153C Assessment: ITAT Quashes ₹2.90 Crore Addition View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
June 2026
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930