Delhi High Court

No Absolute Exemption to CBI From RTI Act: Delhi HC

CPIO CBI Vs. CJ Karira (Delhi High Court)

The Delhi High Court has directed the CBI to consider the application of an RTI activist seeking information about corruption within the central investigating body and action taken into allegations made by Delhi Chief Minister Arvind Kejriwal of shady probe into the coalgate scam pursuant to a news report....

Read More

Before Passing an Order U/s. 263 Principal CIT or CIT has to do their Own Enquiry

PCIT vs. Delhi Airport Metro Express Pvt. Ltd (Delhi High Court)

Before Passing An Order Under Section 263 Principal Commissioner Or Commissioner Of Income Tax Has To Make His/Her Own Enquiry...

Read More

Tax Exemption cannot be denied to Trust not meant for one particular religious community

CIT (Exemptions) Vs. M/s. Indian Society Of The Church Of Jesus Christ Of Latter Day Saints (Delhi High Court)

It has been found that the activities of the Assessee Society, though both religious and charitable, were not exclusively meant for one particular religious community. It was, therefore, rightly not denied exemption under Section 11 of the Act....

Read More

HC allows Import without IGST payment against Advance Authorization

Narendra Plastic Private Limited Vs Union of India & Ors. (Delhi High Court)

Delhi High Court on appeal by Narendra Plastic Private Limited  directed as under: (i) The Petitioner will be permitted to clear the consignments of imports constituting inputs for the fulfilment of its export orders placed on it prior to 1st July 2017 without any additional levies, and subject to the quantity and value as specified [&he...

Read More

Mere Cheque payment and establishing ID of creditors is not sufficient to make a loan genuine

Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax – 7 Vs Bikram Singh (Delhi High Court)

The use of deceptive loan entries to bring unaccounted money into banking channels plagues the legitimate economy of our country. The mere fact that the identity of the lenders is established & payments are made by cheques does not mean they are genuine....

Read More

Revision on the ground that AO did not conduct a detailed inquiry due to paucity of time is invalid

Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax (Central-02) Vs. Mera Baba Reality Associates Pvt. Ltd. (Delhi High Court)

S. 263: Lack of inquiry vs. Inadequate inquiry: Revision on the ground that the AO did not conduct a detailed inquiry on account of paucity of time is unfair to the assessee and invalid (Amitabh Bachhan 384 ITR 200 (SC) & Maithan International 375 ITR 123 (Cal) distinguished ...

Read More

Section 115JB does not apply to insurance companies

Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd Vs DCIT (Delhi High Court)

Applicability of Section 115JB to insurance companies Turning now to ITA No. 447/2015, the question concerns the applicability of Section 115JB of the Act to insurance companies. The ITAT has permitted the Assessee to raise this question since, in a large number of judgments of the ITAT, the question has been answered in favour of [&helli...

Read More

Exemption U/s. 11 cannot be denied for delayed-filing of audit report alongwith return due to seizure of accounts

DIT(E) Vs. Vishwa Hindu Parishad (Delhi High Court)

Conclusion: Where assessee trust could not file audit report as its accounts having been seized were released for quite a shorter time period before filing of return, however, the audit report had been filed along with revised return filed by assessee even before last date prescribed for completion of assessment, AO was not justified in d...

Read More

GST: Delhi HC grants interim relief to Gold Dore Bar Importers

Kundan Care Products Limited Vs Union of India & ANR. (Delhi High Court)

Rule 44 A is challenged as being ultra vires Section 140 of the CGST Act as well as the rule making powers under Section 164 thereof. It is contended that the impugned Notification is in grossly discriminatory and unreasonable and has imposed the restrictions which are applicable only to imported gold dore bars...

Read More

Approval to Reopening by officer superior to Addl. DIT U/s. 151(2) is invalid

Yum Restaurants Asia Pte. Ltd Vs Deputy Director Of Income Tax And Ors (Delhi High Court)

This writ petition by Yum! Restaurants Asia PTE Ltd. under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution, seeks the quashing of a notice dated 28th March 2012 issued by the Deputy Director of Income Tax (hereinafter the Assessing Officer or AO) under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter the Act) seeking to reopen the assessment...

Read More
Page 1 of 11712345...102030...Last »

Browse All Categories

CA, CS, CMA (3,481)
Company Law (3,399)
Custom Duty (6,603)
DGFT (3,446)
Excise Duty (4,043)
Fema / RBI (3,249)
Finance (3,454)
Income Tax (25,017)
SEBI (2,733)
Service Tax (3,280)