Delhi High Court

Director cannot be disqualified for failure of company to effect statutory compliances

Vikas Goel & ANR Vs Union of India & ANR (Delhi High Court)

Petitioners had ceased to be the Directors of the Company, as stated by them, on 8thApril, 2011 and that they could not have been penalized for the failure of the company to effect statutory compliances....

Read More

Notice U/s. 148 served at factory premises of Assessee on security guard is valid

CIT Vs M/s Sudev industries limited (Delhi High Court)

CIT Vs M/s Sudev industries limited (Delhi High Court) Whether the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal is justified in law in holding that service of notice at the factory premises of the Assessee on the security guard was not proper service under the provisions of Section 282(2) of the Income Tax Act, 1961? Section 282 of […]...

Read More

Deposit paid during first appeal can be adjusted while filing second appeal

M/s Santani Sales Organisation Vs Central excise, customs and service tax appellate triubnal (Delhi High Court)

Question raised in the present writ petition is whether as per Section 35F of the Central Excise Act, 1944 (C.E. Act, for short) the petitioner-assessee on filing of second appeal before the Central Excise, Customs and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (Tribunal, for short) is required to make an additional pre-deposit of 10% of the duty and...

Read More

A person cannot be disqualified for non submission of his resignation by company in question

Karn Gupta Vs Union of India (Delhi High Court)

It is submitted that in the above facts and circumstances of the case that the petitioner has resigned from the directorship of the company in question, the petitioner would not incur a disqualification under Section 164 of the Companies Act. Consequently, the disqualification of the petitioner as notified in the lists dated 6thSeptember,...

Read More

Swarovski India Pvt. Ltd Appeal: The three golden rulings

Swarovski India Pvt. Ltd. Vs DCIT (Delhi High Court)

1. While allowing deduction under section 10B, the deduction is to be allowed to eligible undertaking, even the income being in negative. 2. Cutting and polishing of precious and semi precious stones constitutes manufacturing as contemplated in section 10B, 3. No fresh fact or fresh material which formed the reasons to believe for reop...

Read More

HC on levy of IGST on Import under advance license

Jindal Dye chem Industries (P) Ltd. Vs Union of India ((Delhi High Court)

Jindal Dye chem Industries (P) Ltd. Vs Union of India ((Delhi High Court) It is apparent from these facts that the imports which are the  subject matter of the present writ petition were in fact made after the  introduction of GST Regime. The petitioner is the beneficiary of an advance license issued on 17.07.2017. At that […]...

Read More

Income U/s. 271AAA justified if Asssessee fails to specify as to how she derived undisclosed income

Pr. CIT Vs Ritu Singal (Delhi High Court)

Assessee clearly failed to specify as to how she derived undisclosed income and under what head it fell in (rent, capital gains, professional or business income out of money lending source of the income, etc. Unless such facts were mentioned with some specificity, it could not be said that conditions in section 271AAA(2) were satisfied b...

Read More

Writ in Delhi High Court on Several Issues related to GST

Sales Tax Bar Association (Regd), &Anr. Vs Union of India & ORS. (Delhi High Court)

Third issue highlighted by the petitioner is that Central and State Acts permit rectification of mistakes. However, GSTN portal does not permit rectification of a return already filed. Rectification is to be made in the subsequent return. Nevertheless authorities are issuing notices to the assessees whenever rectification is made, treatin...

Read More

Mere Higher fair market value cannot be a ground to assume that there was under-statement of consideration

Arun Malhotra Vs CIT (Delhi High Court)

ITA Nos.405/2005 and 406/2005 have been filed by an individual, Arjun Malhotra impugning common order dated 29th January, 2004 passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (hereinafter referred to as the tribunal) deciding ITA Nos.1433/Del/2002 and 1434/Del/2002 relating to Assessment Years (AY, for short) 1998-99 and 1999-2000...

Read More

Approach Nodal Officers for GST related grievances: HC

Sare Realty Projects (P.) Ltd. Vs Union of India (Delhi High Court)

Counsel for Revenue wishes to bring on record copies of Circular No. 39/13/2018-GST dated 03.04.2018 setting up an IT Grievance Redressal Mechanism in form of a Committee....

Read More
Page 1 of 12912345...102030...Last »

Browse All Categories

CA, CS, CMA (3,749)
Company Law (3,883)
Custom Duty (6,955)
DGFT (3,686)
Excise Duty (4,144)
Fema / RBI (3,479)
Finance (3,670)
Income Tax (27,499)
SEBI (2,899)
Service Tax (3,370)