Delhi High Court rules that the Income Tax Department cannot claim funds from a Ponzi scam for tax dues, as the money is not “income” but “proceeds of crime.”
Delhi High Court held that imposition of uniform levy of UF-10 and property tax at the rate of 20% on 3-star and above hotels is, therefore, a valid exercise of legislative discretion and withstands scrutiny under Article 14 of the Constitution.
Delhi High Court held that AO has sufficient information available with him to carry out reassessment proceedings. Accordingly, reopening of assessment u/s. 148A of the Income Tax Act upheld and petition dismissed.
Delhi High Court in VRG Electronics v. PCIT reaffirms a liberal approach to condoning ITR filing delays under Section 119(2)(b). Court ruled that an accountant’s negligence can constitute genuine hardship.
In Puneet Batra vs UOI, the Delhi HC ruled that GST officials cannot access a lawyer’s computer without his presence, and set conditions for examining seized data.
The Delhi High Court has set aside a 3.16 crore GST demand against National Aluminium Company Limited (NALCO), ruling that the company was not given a proper opportunity to respond.
he Delhi High Court directs the Customs Department to refund a Kuwaiti resident for a seized gold piece that was disposed of prematurely.
The Delhi High Court has set aside a Rs. 2 lakh penalty on a 19-year-old taekwondo player, Vivek Kumar Singh, finding that he was acting on instructions from his coach.
Delhi HC has directed Ahlcons India Pvt. Ltd. to file an appeal with CESTAT, limiting pre-deposit amount and raising questions about re-confirming previously dropped demands.
The Delhi High Court has set aside a GST demand of over ₹10 crore against Manpower Group Services, ruling that the tax officer’s order was cryptic and failed to consider the company’s detailed reply and supporting documents.
