Delay of 208 days condoned on bona fide grounds with ₹1,000 cost; ITAT sets aside ex-parte CIT(A) order, holding denial of hearing violates natural justice, and remands matter to AO for fresh adjudication with full opportunity.
ITAT remands ₹33.12 lakh agricultural income claim due to lack of evidence; holds no proof means taxable u/s 68/115BBE, but grants one more chance for verification, imposing ₹2,000 cost for non-compliance.
Condonation of 100 + month delay allowed on liberal principles with ₹5,000 cost; ITAT holds gross receipts of charitable trust cannot be taxed-even if Sec 11 denied, only net income after expenses is taxable; matter remanded for verification.
TP ruling clarifies that comparables must meet uniform filters, FAR analysis prevails over search matrix, ESOP adjustments require parity, working capital needs scientific computation, and delayed receivables attract LIBOR-based interest.
The case examined reassessment based on third-party information without independent application of mind. The Tribunal ruled that reliance on borrowed satisfaction invalidated the addition, leading to its deletion.
The issue involved unexplained bank credits treated under Section 69A. The Tribunal held that the assessee proved identity, creditworthiness, and genuineness, leading to deletion of the addition.
The case addressed the taxability of duty drawback income based on accounting method. The Tribunal ruled that taxing it on accrual basis was incorrect and ordered deletion of the addition.
The case dealt with disallowance of employee contributions deposited beyond statutory due dates. The Tribunal remanded the matter for fresh examination of how “due date” should be determined, emphasizing factual verification and legal interpretation.
The case addressed disallowance of employee contributions deposited beyond prescribed timelines. The Tribunal upheld the legal position but directed verification of actual compliance with statutory due dates.
The case examined whether delayed employee contributions could be disallowed under Section 143(1). The Tribunal held such adjustments invalid on debatable issues and ordered deletion of the addition.
