Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Mansukhlal Meghji Dodhia Vs DCIT (ITAT Mumbai)
Related Assessment Year : 2012-13
Upgrade to Basic or Premium to download. Already Upgraded? Login here to access.
Mansukhlal Meghji Dodhia Vs DCIT (ITAT Mumbai) In Mansukhlal Meghji Dodhia (AYs 2012-13 to 2016-17), additions were made u/s 69D for alleged hundi cash loans and u/s 68 for unsecured loan from M/s Vinam Finance Pvt. Ltd. based on seized papers, investigation reports and third-party statements. The ITAT held that for unabated assessment years, additions under s.153A cannot survive in absence of year-specific incriminating material, relying on the Supreme Court ruling in Abhisar Buildwell. The seized documents were treated as loose papers/promissory notes without corroboration of actual cash mov...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Defect in Section 143(2) Notice Format Is Curable Under Section 292B: ITAT Bangalore Cash Loan Enforceable Under NI Act Despite Section 269SS Breach: SC Kolkata ITAT Quashes Assessment as Section 143(2) Notice Was Without Jurisdiction BSNL VRS-2019 Ex-gratia Fully Exempt Under Section 10(10B): Surat ITAT Patna ITAT Deletes Search Additions Based on Retracted Statements & Estimates View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
July 2026
M T W T F S S
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
2728293031