Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : ITO Vs Mahesh Kumar Aggarwal (ITAT Delhi)
Related Assessment Year : 2021-22
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
ITO Vs Mahesh Kumar Aggarwal (ITAT Delhi) Bogus Purchase Addition Deleted – Mere Non-Response to 133(6) Notices Not Enough The ITAT Delhi dismissed the Revenue’s appeal and upheld the NFAC order deleting addition made by estimating net profit @8% after rejecting books u/s 145(3). The AO had treated purchases as doubtful mainly because some suppliers were non-filers, GST registrations were inactive, and certain parties did not respond to notices u/s 133(6). The Tribunal observed that the assessee had furnished purchase bills, bank statements, PAN and GST details, and payments were through b...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Section 68 Addition on Loans From Wife and Company Deleted: Delhi ITAT Section 271D Penalty Quashed as Six-Month Limitation Expired: Bengaluru ITAT Mumbai ITAT Deletes Section 69A Addition as CHA Customs Duty Collections Are Fiduciary Receipts Mumbai ITAT Deletes Section 69A Addition for Recorded Jewellery Sales During Demonetisation Mumbai ITAT Deletes Demonetisation Addition as Marriage Gifts and Past Savings Explain Cash Deposits View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
July 2026
M T W T F S S
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
2728293031