Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : ITO Vs Mahesh Kumar Aggarwal (ITAT Delhi)
Related Assessment Year : 2021-22
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.

ITO Vs Mahesh Kumar Aggarwal (ITAT Delhi)

Bogus Purchase Addition Deleted – Mere Non-Response to 133(6) Notices Not Enough

The ITAT Delhi dismissed the Revenue’s appeal and upheld the NFAC order deleting addition made by estimating net profit @8% after rejecting books u/s 145(3). The AO had treated purchases as doubtful mainly because some suppliers were non-filers, GST registrations were inactive, and certain parties did not respond to notices u/s 133(6). The Tribunal observed that the assessee had furnished purchase bills, bank statements, PAN and GST

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Free Gift Scheme Valid Business Promotion – ITAT Deletes ₹1.47 Cr Disallowance Penalty U/s 271DA & 271E Invalid When Original Assessment Set Aside – ITAT Deletes Penalties Bank Deposits Treated as Business Receipts – ITAT Upholds Deletion of ₹1.71 Cr Addition u/s 69A Reassessment Quashed – Notice U/s 148 Held Time-Barred & Ante-Dated ITAT Chennai: No Addition U/s 56(2)(vii) Where Valuation Difference Within 10% Tolerance Band View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Ads Free tax News and Updates
Search Post by Date
March 2026
M T W T F S S
 1
2345678
9101112131415
16171819202122
23242526272829
3031