This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
Bogus Purchase Addition Deleted – Mere Non-Response to 133(6) Notices Not Enough
Case Law Details
- Case Name
- ITO Vs Mahesh Kumar Aggarwal (ITAT Delhi)
- Appeal Number
- Only available for paid members
- Date of Judgement/Order
- Only available for paid members
- Related Assessment Year
- 2021-22
- Courts
- All ITAT, ITAT Delhi
Upgrade to Basic or Premium to download.
Already Upgraded? Log in.
Advertisement
ITO Vs Mahesh Kumar Aggarwal (ITAT Delhi)
Bogus Purchase Addition Deleted – Mere Non-Response to 133(6) Notices Not Enough
The ITAT Delhi dismissed the Revenue’s appeal and upheld the NFAC order deleting addition made by estimating net profit @8% after rejecting books u/s 145(3). The AO had treated purchases as doubtful mainly because some suppliers were non-filers, GST registrations were inactive, and certain parties did not respond to notices u/s 133(6). The Tribunal observed that the assessee had furnished purchase bills, bank statements, PAN and GST details, and paymen...
Author Info
