Company Law India: Read latest Company law news & updates, acts, circular, notifications & articles issued by MCA amendment in companies Act 2013. Article on Loans Company formation XBRL, Schedule VI IFRS.
Company Law : Private limited companies with turnover above ₹200 crore or borrowings exceeding ₹100 crore must appoint an internal auditor u...
Company Law : The article highlights how companies completed PAS-3 filings but failed to maintain critical Right Issue documentation such as off...
Company Law : The Companies Act, 2013 and related rules now require most public and private companies to issue and transfer securities only in d...
Company Law : The Companies Law Amendment Bill, 2026 proposes major reforms in corporate governance, compliance, and digital regulation. This ar...
Company Law : This guide explains the complete legal procedure for shifting a company’s registered office within the same state but under a di...
Company Law : Provisional list of audit firms of listed companies yet to file NFRA-2 for 2023-24. Filing deadline was 30.11.2025; fines apply fo...
Company Law : ICSI recommended restoring public access to basic company master data without mandatory login requirements. The representation sta...
Company Law : The issue concerns eligibility and participation rules for the convocation. ICSI has clarified that members who do not attend will...
Company Law : NFRA introduced guidelines to evaluate audit firms’ compliance and quality control systems. The framework emphasizes governance,...
Company Law : ICSI has proposed revising the CS syllabus to align with the National Education Policy and global practices. Stakeholder input wil...
Company Law : A resolution applicant could not unilaterally alter its financial proposal through a last minute addendum after completion of the ...
Company Law : The Madras High Court permitted Nidhi companies to submit fresh replies against NDH-4 rejection orders and directed authorities to...
Company Law : NCLT Mumbai held that existence of an arbitration clause in the MoU did not bar initiation of CIRP under Section 7 of the IBC. The...
Company Law : NCLT held that inclusion of a prospective bidder in an email chain was an isolated inadvertent act caused by auto-suggest and not ...
Company Law : The Appellate Tribunal upheld findings that the arrangement allowing the Successful Resolution Applicant to receive 50% of PUFE re...
Company Law : ROC Pune held that procedural lapses in a private placement involving one investor formed part of a single integrated transaction ...
Company Law : ROC Pune penalized a start-up company and its officers for delayed filing of e-Form MGT-14 relating to a Special Resolution under ...
Company Law : ROC Pune penalized a company and its directors for delayed filing of e-Form PAS-3 relating to private placement allotment under Se...
Company Law : ROC Pune penalized a company and its directors for utilizing private placement funds before filing return of allotment under Secti...
Company Law : ROC Mumbai-II imposed penalty under Section 450 after a company incorrectly mentioned the AGM date in Form AOC-4 XBRL. The order h...
NCLT Mumbai held that since existence of financial debt and default thereon is established, application filed under section 9 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code for initiation of Corporate Insolvency and Resolution Process [CIRP] against Proto D Industries Pvt. Ltd. [Corporate Debtor] is admitted.
MCA amended its notification to postpone implementation of the reorganised Registrars of Companies framework under the Companies Act.
MCA amended its earlier notification to postpone the effective date of the restructured Regional Director jurisdictions under the Companies Act.
The MCA has allowed companies to file annual returns and financial statements for FY 2024–25 up to 31 January 2026 without additional fees. The key takeaway is a temporary but significant compliance relief for delayed filings.
The Registrar held that not serving annual reports within the prescribed time violates statutory disclosure obligations. Informal or oral practices cannot replace mandatory compliance.
The issue was whether an individual accused could be compelled to represent a corporate accused in a PMLA trial. The court held that only the company can appoint its representative and set aside the trial court’s order.
The Court declined to order criminal prosecution based on a complaint to the corporate regulator, holding such relief untenable in writ jurisdiction. The petitioner was left free to pursue remedies under the law.
The NCLAT upheld the rejection of repayment plans submitted by personal guarantors under the I&B Code, as they failed to submit revised proposals despite extensions, confirming the legal procedure was correctly followed.
This explains when manufacturing companies must undergo cost audit based on turnover thresholds. The key takeaway is that exceeding ₹100 crore overall turnover and ₹35 crore product revenue triggers compliance.
Until MCA issues further clarification, professionals should continue issuing MGT-8 on peer-reviewed letterheads with UDIN and attach it to MGT-7/MGT-7A.
