Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Suresh Bhatia (HUF) Vs DCIT (ITAT Bangalore)
Related Assessment Year : 2016-17
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Suresh Bhatia (HUF) Vs DCIT (ITAT Bangalore) The ITAT Bangalore held that reassessment proceedings initiated under Section 147 were invalid due to improper approval under Section 151, thereby quashing the entire assessment. In this case, the assessee (HUF) had originally filed a nil return, but the AO reopened the case based on information regarding short-term capital loss on mutual funds (₹2.05 crore). Notice under Section 148 was issued on 26.07.2022, i.e., beyond 3 years from the end of the relevant AY (2016–17). As per the amended law post Finance Act, 2021, such reopening beyond 3 yea...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Wrong Section Used to Deny Depreciation Set-Off; Section 263 Order Quashed Municipal Body’s Section 10(20) Exemption Cannot Be Denied Due to Wrong Claim in Return No Addition on a Different Issue if Reopened Issue Fails: ITAT Deletes ₹5.75 Crore Disallowance Retracted Statement Alone Cannot Justify Section 68 Addition: ITAT Deletes Accommodation Loan Additions Section 263 Cannot Be Invoked as AO Made No Addition After Enquiry: ITAT Mumbai View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
June 2026
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930