Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Mridul Shashikant Khandelwal Vs PCIT (ITAT Mumbai)
Related Assessment Year : 2014-2015
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Mridul Shashikant Khandelwal Vs PCIT (ITAT Mumbai) U/s 263 Cannot Be Invoked Merely Because AO Made No Addition After Enquiry In a significant ruling, the Mumbai ITAT quashed a revision order passed under section 263, holding that the Principal CIT cannot revise an assessment merely because the Assessing Officer, after conducting enquiries, chose not to make any addition. The case arose from a search on the Alankit Group, pursuant to which proceedings under section 153C were initiated against the assessee based on alleged accommodation entry transactions reflected in seized material. The Asses...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Entire Books Cannot Be Rejected for One Unproved Expense: ITAT Ahmedabad Section 10(10B) Exemption Allowed on BSNL VRS Compensation: ITAT Ahmedabad On-Money Addition Restricted to Co-owner’s Investment Share: ITAT Ahmedabad Section 54B: Time to Revisit Rural Agricultural Land Withdrawal Rules Section 80P(2)(d) Deduction Allowed on Interest from Co-operative Bank Deposits: ITAT Pune View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
July 2026
M T W T F S S
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
2728293031