ITAT Bangalore held that addition u/s. 69A unjustified as cash deposited in bank account is from business income and the same is already considered under the Profits & gains of business or profession.
ITAT Bangalore held that dismissal of appeal by First Appellate Authority [CIT(A)] due to non-payment of advance tax unjustified as assessee was not required to pay advance tax. Hence, matter remanded back for fresh consideration.
ITAT Bangalore condones a 69-day delay in filing an appeal, citing COVID-19 as a reasonable cause. Case reassessed by CIT(A) for the 2010-11 assessment year
ITAT ruled that co-operative societies under the Karnataka Souharda Sahakari Act qualify for Section 80P deductions, allowing for the appeal to be reconsidered.
ITAT Bangalore imposes ₹1000 fine on taxpayer for non-appearance during assessment proceedings, payable to the PM Relief Fund. Case remitted for fresh consideration
ITAT Bangalore remands Meghana Satish Shetty’s case to CIT(A) for fresh adjudication, citing COVID-19 related delays and extended gaps in hearing notices.
Assessee challenged CIT(A) order before the Bangalore Bench of ITAT arguing that 1450 grams of gold should not be considered unexplained as it fell within the permissible limits of CBDT Instruction No. 1916.
ITAT Bangalore held that addition under section 68 of the Income Tax Act towards unexplained money send back for de novo reassessment due to difference in amounts and unclear information.
ITAT Bangalore held that rejection of exemption u/s. 11 of the Income Tax Act due to non-appearance of form 10B in e-filing portal unjustified as form was already filed but was not appearing in e-filing portal. Matter remanded for fresh consideration.
ITAT Bangalore held that approval given under section 153D of the Income Tax Act at the fag end of assessment in a mechanical manner and without application of mind is invalid and bad in law.
