Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Suresh Bhatia (HUF) Vs DCIT (ITAT Bangalore)
Related Assessment Year : 2016-17
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Suresh Bhatia (HUF) Vs DCIT (ITAT Bangalore) The ITAT Bangalore held that reassessment proceedings initiated under Section 147 were invalid due to improper approval under Section 151, thereby quashing the entire assessment. In this case, the assessee (HUF) had originally filed a nil return, but the AO reopened the case based on information regarding short-term capital loss on mutual funds (₹2.05 crore). Notice under Section 148 was issued on 26.07.2022, i.e., beyond 3 years from the end of the relevant AY (2016–17). As per the amended law post Finance Act, 2021, such reopening beyond 3 yea...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Benami Veil Cannot Be Lifted by Clever Drafting: SC Restores Rejection of Plaint at Threshold Specific Performance Decree Does Not Die Automatically: SC Revives Execution Despite Delay in Deposit IBC Is Not a Recovery Shortcut: SC Rejects CIRP in Builder-Bank-Borrower Dispute No Signature, Yet Bound by Arbitration: SC Allows Collaborator to Invoke Arbitration Clause Entire Bank Deposits Cannot Be Taxed as Income – ITAT Restricts Addition to 2% in Renukamata Society Cases View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Ads Free tax News and Updates
Search Post by Date
May 2026
M T W T F S S
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031