Case Law Details
Case Name : Suresh Bhatia (HUF) Vs DCIT (ITAT Bangalore)
Related Assessment Year : 2016-17
Courts :
All ITAT ITAT Bangalore
Become a Premium member to Download.
If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Suresh Bhatia (HUF) Vs DCIT (ITAT Bangalore)
The ITAT Bangalore held that reassessment proceedings initiated under Section 147 were invalid due to improper approval under Section 151, thereby quashing the entire assessment.
In this case, the assessee (HUF) had originally filed a nil return, but the AO reopened the case based on information regarding short-term capital loss on mutual funds (₹2.05 crore). Notice under Section 148 was issued on 26.07.2022, i.e., beyond 3 years from the end of the relevant AY (2016–17).
As per the amended law post Finance Act, 2021, such reopening beyond 3 yea...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
Kindly Refer to
Privacy Policy &
Complete Terms of Use and Disclaimer.


