Advertisement
Advertisement
Skip to content
Follow Us on
Advertisement
TOP STORIES
Excise Duty

Rule 10A Not Applicable Due to Absence of Job Work Relationship: CESTAT Mumbai

Case Law Details

Case Name
BBM Heavy Machinery Private Limited Vs Commissioner of GST & Central Excise (CESTAT Mumbai)
Date of Judgement/Order
Only available for paid members
Advertisement BBM Heavy Machinery Private Limited Vs Commissioner of GST & Central Excise (CESTAT Mumbai) Whether the department apply Rule 10A and treat the appellant as a job worker for valuation purposes? The appellant manufacture heavy machinery/equipment. Business is run by a joint venture (JV); agreement dated 19.07.2011 entered into with M/s SMS Meer India Limited, an Indian company and M/s Officine Meccaniche BBM SPA, Italy. The department alleged that appellants had manufactured final products out of certain raw materials supplied by M/s SMS, but failed to pay the central excis...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
Advertisement

Join TaxGuru's Network for the latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *