This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
Rule 10A Not Applicable Due to Absence of Job Work Relationship: CESTAT Mumbai
Case Law Details
- Case Name
- BBM Heavy Machinery Private Limited Vs Commissioner of GST & Central Excise (CESTAT Mumbai)
- Appeal Number
- Only available for paid members
- Date of Judgement/Order
- Only available for paid members
- Courts
- All CESTAT, CESTAT Mumbai
Upgrade to Basic or Premium to download.
Already Upgraded? Log in.
Advertisement
BBM Heavy Machinery Private Limited Vs Commissioner of GST & Central Excise (CESTAT Mumbai)
Whether the department apply Rule 10A and treat the appellant as a job worker for valuation purposes?
The appellant manufacture heavy machinery/equipment. Business is run by a joint venture (JV); agreement dated 19.07.2011 entered into with M/s SMS Meer India Limited, an Indian company and M/s Officine Meccaniche BBM SPA, Italy. The department alleged that appellants had manufactured final products out of certain raw materials supplied by M/s SMS, but failed to pay the central excis...





