Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Girish Kumar Raval Vs Union of India & Ors. (Bombay High Court)
Related Assessment Year :
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Girish Kumar Raval Vs Union of India & Ors. (Bombay High Court) Bombay HC Stays ₹16 Crore GST Penalty on Director: Section 122(1A) Cannot Be Invoked Mechanically The petitioner is a director of the company. The company is the registered tax payer. There was an allegation that the company has short paid GST. There was a demand of over Rs.16 crores along with interest and penalty confirmed under section 74 against the company. A penalty of same amount came to be imposed on the director under section 122(1A) of the CGST Act. The same was challenged in writ. The Hon’ble Bombay High Court a...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
July 2026
M T W T F S S
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
2728293031