CESTAT Mumbai

Cenvat Credit on input Services at Job Workers premises

Larsen & Toubro Ltd. Vs CCE (CESTAT Mumbai)

Larsen & Toubro Ltd. Vs CCE (CESTAT Mumbai) This is an appeal has been filed by the appellants against denial of credit of service tax in respect of services provided to their job workers while doing their job work. 2. Ld. Counsel for the appellants argued that they were operating in Rule 4(5) of Cenvat […]...

Read More

No provision for inclusion of value of scrap as additional consideration

Shapoorji Pallonji & Co. Ltd. Vs. CCE (CESTAT Mumbai)

There is no provision in Service Tax Rules for inclu­sion of value of scrap as an additional consideration; only the amounts received towards taxable services are leviable to service tax. ...

Read More

Section 11D cannot be invoked if excise duty collected been paid to Govt

CCE Vs. PRP Wire Ropes (CESTAT Mumbai)

It was not even alleged that they collected a amount as ‘duty' but not paid it to the exchequer. None of situation specified in section 11D is applicable in the present case. In fact, in such a situation, there should not have any grievance to the parties since the appellants had paid the amount whatever they collected and paid it compl...

Read More

CESTAT bench must follow decision of coordinate bench

Vivilon Textiles Industries Ltd. Vs. CCE (CESTAT Mumbai)

We have also observed that in the earlier proceedings in this case the matter was heard by the division bench of this Tribunal. After hearing of the matter, a difference of opinion arose between the Members and the matter was referred to the third member of this Tribunal and thereafter a majority decision has been […]...

Read More

Section 11AC: No Interest / Penalty on value of goods escalated by buyer retrospectively

CCE Vs. Minda Industries Ltd. (CESTAT Mumbai)

The fact of the case is that the respondent had cleared their finished goods to their customer by valuing the goods on the basis of purchase order placed by them by their customers. However, consequent upon price escalation, their customers amended the purchase order and revised the price of the goods on the higher side with retrospective...

Read More

Marketing Expense sharing would not Amount to BAS Services

SMV Beverages Pvt. Ltd. Vs Commissioner of Central Excise (CESTAT Mumbai)

The definition of business auxiliary service may not cover the transaction in this case, as the main appellant is not promoting or marketing of services provided by PFL as there is no service which has been provided by PFL in the case in hand....

Read More

Tax exemption can't be denied for Service fee designation in Rs.

Commissioner of Service Tax Vs Balaji Telefilms Ltd. (CESTAT Mumbai)

It is held that although contract, undoubtedly, designates the consideration in Indian rupees so that the service provider is not put to loss on account of currency fluctuations and merely because Service provider designates the consideration in Indian rupees, his Service Tax Exemption on Exports cannot be denied, ...

Read More

Order cannot travel beyond allegations raised in SCN

R.R. Paints (P.) Ltd. Vs Commissioner of Central Excise, Mumbai-III (CESTAT Mumbai)

In this case in the show-cause notice the allegation is that the appellant availed input service credit on construction of shopping complex outside the factory premises whereas in the impugned order, the demand has been confirmed on the ground that the service provided and credit availed was not either directly or indirectly in relation t...

Read More

Service Tax Payable on SIM Card Activation Charges

Loop Mobile India Ltd. Vs Commissioner of Service Tax (CESTAT Mumbai)

The appellant were selling the sim cards to their franchisee and was paying sales tax to the State and activating the sim cards in the hands of subscribers at a valuable consideration and paying sales tax on the activation charges....

Read More

No Service tax on sharing of resource, cost/ expense with Group Companies

Reliance ADA Group Pvt. Ltd. Vs Commissioner of Service Tax (CESTAT Mumbai)

CESTAT, Mumbai held that reimbursement of the cost of obtaining and employing resources/certain expenses incurred by the Appellant on the behalf of the Group Companies cannot be regarded as consideration flowing to the Appellant towards the taxable service provided by the Appellant rather the receipts are towards the reimbursements of the...

Read More
Page 1 of 1312345...10...Last »

Browse All Categories

CA, CS, CMA (3,504)
Company Law (3,434)
Custom Duty (6,630)
DGFT (3,466)
Excise Duty (4,048)
Fema / RBI (3,272)
Finance (3,475)
Income Tax (25,143)
SEBI (2,753)
Service Tax (3,285)