CESTAT Mumbai held that rejection of request for amendment of shipping bills u/s. 149 of the Customs Act, 1962 on the ground of delay unjustified as legal provisions doesn’t prescribe any specific time limit.
CESTAT approves refund claim of ₹15.3 lakh for Rare Townships Pvt Ltd. Dispute over stamp duty compliance resolved in favor of the appellant.
CESTAT Mumbai directs refund verification of ₹24 lakhs pre-deposit in Shiva Steel Industries case, remanding for fresh proceedings and verification of documents.
CESTAT Mumbai ruled in favor of ATA Freightline, setting aside service tax demands for logistics services from April 2015 to June 2017. Full details of the case.
CESTAT Mumbai overturned the service tax demand on Hindustan Construction Co., ruling that reimbursements to group companies do not constitute taxable services.
CESTAT Mumbai quashes SCN against fruit seller for non-payment of service tax, ruling it was not engaged in a service tax leviable activity.
CESTAT Mumbai allows Bhor Industries’ appeal, addressing unjust enrichment and duty refund issues from 1970-1982. Remanded case for compliance with prior directions.
Original authority should assign specific reasons for rejection of declared value and duly follow provisions contained in Section 14 ibid read with Valuation Rules, 2007 for re-determination of assessable value.
CESTAT Mumbai upholds refund claim for Goa Golf Club Pvt Ltd, dismissing the appeal by the Customs Department. Learn about the key legal insights and judgment details.
CESTAT Mumbai ruling on USMS Saffron Co Inc vs Commissioner of Customs, quashing duty demand for ‘saffron’ misuse as food flavour and colour.
