All CESTAT

CENVAT Credit eligible on Sales Commission

Federal Mogul TRP (India) Ltd Vs Commissioner of Central Tax (CESTAT Bangalore)

It has been consistently held that sales commission fall under definition of 'input service'. By following the ratio of the above said decisions, we hold that denial of CENVAT Credit on sales commission is not sustainable in law....

Read More

Service tax not applicable on permanent transfer of IP Rights

SKOL Breweries Ltd. (Now known as Anheuser Busch InBev India Ltd.) Vs C.C.E & C.S.T. (CESTAT Bangalore)

Assignment of trademark and the IPR were amounted to permanent transfer and no service tax was applicable on permanent transfer of IP Rights by Foster's to assessee. ...

Read More

No Service Tax on Remuneration to Director in employment of the company

Bengal Beverages Pvt. Ltd. Vs CGST & Excise, Howrah (CESTAT Kolkata)

Bengal Beverages Pvt. Ltd. Vs CGST & Excise, Howrah (CESTAT Kolkata) In the instant case, the only dispute herein is for payment of remuneration in the nature and form of commission based on percentage of profit to whole time directors, which is a fact on record. Section 2(94) of Companies Act, 2013, duly defines ‘whole-time [&helli...

Read More

Credit cannot be denied on services used for providing warranty services

Power Build Pvt Ltd Vs C.C.E. & S.T. (CESTAT Ahmedabad)

Power Build Pvt Ltd Vs C.C.E. & S.T. (CESTAT Ahmedabad) Warranty Service which implies that the value is already included in the sale price of the goods. Moreover, there is no requirement in the definition of Input Service that the value is to be included in the assessable value for the purpose of Central Excise […]...

Read More

NIDB data cannot be sole basis to reject transaction value without any cogent reasons

Commissioner Of Customs Vs Hanuman Prasad & Sons (CESTAT Delhi)

The issue under consideration is whether the invoice represent the true transaction value in the international market? This casual observation is not based on the factual position that emerges from the records of the case. Thus, for all the reasons above, the Commissioner (Appeals) was not justified in setting aside the orders passed by t...

Read More

No monetary consideration- No Service Tax : CESTAT

Golcha Properties Pvt. Ltd. (Golcha Cinema) Vs Principal Commissioner of Service Tax (CESTAT Delhi)

Golcha Properties Pvt. Ltd. (Golcha Cinema) Vs Principal Commissioner of Service Tax (CESTAT Delhi) The agreement with M/s. A.A. Films that was enclosed as the seventh relied upon document has only to be examined. A perusal of the agreement between the Appellant and the Distributor would also make it abundantly clear that it is the [&hell...

Read More

Charter hire of work over Rigs cannot be classified as ‘repair or maintenance service’ for Service Tax

Dewanchand Ramsaran Industries Pvt. Ltd. Vs Commissioner of Central Excise & Service Tax (CESTAT Kolkata)

Dewanchand Ramsaran Industries Pvt. Ltd. Vs Commissioner of Central Excise & Service Tax (CESTAT Kolkata) We find that the learned Commissioner, in page No. 7 & 8 of the impugned order, after having noted that aforesaid scope of work, has hurriedly concluded that the work is nothing but maintenance and repair of workover oil wells...

Read More

Cenvat credit eligible on outward transportation from factory gate to customer’s place

Commr. of Central Excise Vs Anmol Biscuits Ltd. (CESTAT Kolkata)

Commr. of Central Excise Vs Anmol Biscuits Ltd. (CESTAT Kolkata) Hon’ble Supreme Court in the case of CCEx.,Belgaum Vs. Vasavadatta Cements Ltd. : 2018 (11) GSTL 3 (SC) held that that the assessee is legally eligible to avail credit on outward transportation availed from place of removal upto a certain point, whether it is a […]...

Read More

Rule 6(3) of CCR, 2004 not applies to supply of dutiable good under SFIS Scheme

Sudhir Power Ltd. Unit-III Vs CCE & ST- Jammu and Kashmir (CESTAT Chandigarh)

Sudhir Power Ltd. Unit-III Vs CCE & ST- Jammu and Kashmir (CESTAT Chandigarh) It is a fact on record that the appellant is manufacturing DG sets and enclosures which are dutiable under Chapter 85 of CETA 1985. The appellant is also clearing goods to the buyers under SFIS Scheme duty free in terms of the […]...

Read More

Certificate of CA or Bank sufficient to establish Linkage between FIRC & Export Invoice

Sentini Technologies Pvt Ltd. Vs Commissioner of Central Excise & Service Tax (CESTAT Hyderabad)

The issue under consideration is whether the export proceeds realised even before the invoices were issued are against exported services since FIRCs are also not show the invoice numbers?...

Read More

No Service Tax on Bariatric Surgery as same is Life-Saving Procedure

Mohak Hi Tech Speciality Hospital Vs Commissioner Of Central Excise, Customs and Service Tax (CESTAT Delhi)

The issue under consideration is whether service tax can be imposed on bariatric surgery even if it is a life-saving procedure? Bariatric Surgery cannot be considered as a Cosmetic or Plastic Surgery, and hence the same is not a taxable service within the meaning of clause (105) (zzzzk) of Section 65 of the Finance Act, 1994....

Read More

No Service Tax on Income from Screening of Movies for Annual Film Festival

Vinay Kumar Proprietor of M/s. Regal Theatre Vs Principal Commissioner of Service Tax (CESTAT Delhi)

The issue under consideration is whether service tax is applicable on income received from screening of movies for the annual film festival?...

Read More

Department cannot force Assessee to Reverse Credit Merely for non-Intimation made under rule 6 of CCR

Rockey Marketing (Chennai) Pvt. Ltd. Vs Commissioner of Service Tax (CESTAT Chennai)

The issue under consideration is whether department cannot force upon the assessee to reverse credit under Rule 6(3)(i) merely for the reason that no intimation under Rule 6 of CCR?...

Read More

Banks eligible to avail ITC on Insurances services availed for Rendering Output Services

South Indian Bank Vs C.C., C.E. & S.T-Calicut (CESTAT Bangalore)

The issue under consideration is whether the assessee banks are eligible for cenvat credit of service tax availed on insurance service received by the banks from the Deposit Insurance and Credit Guarantee Corporation?...

Read More

IGST Exemption available on re-import of repaired parts or aircraft into India

Interglobe Aviation Limited Vs Commissioner of Customs (CESTAT Delhi)

Interglobe Aviation Limited Vs Commissioner of Customs (CESTAT Delhi) Conclusion: Assessee was entitled to exemption from payment of integrated tax under the Exemption Notification on re-import of repaired parts/aircraft into India because in the absence of mention of integrated tax and compensation cess in column (3) under serial no. 2 o...

Read More

CESTAT set aside demand on Mobilization advance which was not consistent with law

Gammon India Ltd Vs CST (CESTAT Mumbai)

Gammon India Ltd Vs CST (CESTAT Mumbai) The Mumbai CESTAT, in Gammon India Ltd Vs. CST held that demand on Mobilization advance is not consistent with law and deserves to be set aside. Proviso to Section 2(31) of the CGST Act 2017 provides that deposits shall not be considered as payment made unless the supplier applies […]...

Read More

Interest for Delayed Service Tax refund – From the date of application or date of order?

Scribetech India Healthcare Pvt Ltd. Vs Commissioner of Central Tax (CESTAT Bangalore)

Scribetech India Healthcare Pvt Ltd. Vs Commissioner of Central Tax (CESTAT Bangalore) The Bangalore CESTAT ordered for the interest for a delayed refund on the expiry of period of three months from the date of receipt of application, following the decission Supreme Court in the case of Ranbaxy Laboratories Ltd. Section 56 of the CGST [&h...

Read More

Time limit not applicable for Service Tax refund to SEZ

Lanco solar Pvt. Limited Vs Commissioner, Central Tax, Central Excise, Customs (CESTAT Delhi)

Lanco solar Pvt. Limited Vs Commissioner, Central Tax, Central Excise, Customs (CESTAT Delhi) Delhi CESTAT  held that the ab initio exemption provided under the SEZ provisions, having overriding effect on the service tax provision. Under such position of law, a notification under service tax cannot restrict or provide a time limit for gr...

Read More

Service Tax exemption to Electrical Contractor under mega exemption Notification?

Arvindra Electricals Vs Commissioner of Central Excise & ST (CESTAT Chandigarh)

Arvindra Electricals Vs Commissioner of Central Excise & ST (CESTAT Chandigarh) Whether Electrical Contractor is exempt from service Tax under mega exemption Notification No. 25/2012-ST issued dated 20.06.2012. Yes, In the case of M/s. Arvindra Electricals Vs Commissioner of Central Excise & ST, Chandigarh it has been decided that...

Read More

Service Tax refund cannot be denied for claim of drawback

Mittal International Vs CCE (CESTAT Chandigarh)

Mittal International Vs CCE (CESTAT Chandigarh) Refund claim was denied on the ground that the said goods have been exported and drawback is allowed on the export of goods. The case of the Revenue is that as the appellants have claimed drawback on export of the goods, therefore, they are not entitled for refund claim […]...

Read More

CESTAT allows ITC which was disallowed under wrong impression

Entertainment world Developers Private Ltd. Vs Commissioner, Customs, Central Excise and Service Tax (CESTAT Delhi)

The issue under consideration is whether the disallowance of input tax credit against service is justified in law? The said demand is also not tenable as the said demand was prima facie raised under the impression that the appellant is not entitled to cenvat credit....

Read More

Service Tax not applicable to salary paid to employees under secondment agreement

Goldman Sachs Services Vs Commissioner of Central Tax (CESTAT Bangalore)

Goldman Sachs Services Vs Commissioner Of Central Tax (CESTAT Bangalore) Facts- Employees of overseas group companies have come on secondment to the assessee. The assessee has entered into separate employment contract with the seconded personnel and employer-employee relationship exists between the assessee and the seconded personnel. It ...

Read More

No ST under RCM on deployment of Employees of Parent Company & Payment of Salaries to them

Komatsu India Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Service Tax (CESTAT Chennai)

The issue under consideration is whether the service tax under RCM will be levied on deputed employees working under control, direction and supervision of overseas companies?...

Read More

Cenvat Credit Can’t be Denied for Export of Exempted goods Outside India

Eastern Chemofarb Limited (DTA Unit) Vs Commissioner of Central Excise (CESTAT Kolkata)

The issue under consideration is whether the lower authority is correct in stating that the appellant is not entitled to avail credit of duty paid on inputs used in the manufacture of exempted goods since they have cleared the said exempted goods for export outside India?...

Read More

Trade discount not liable to service tax as commission

Laxmi Exports Vs Commissioner of Central Excise & ST (CESTAT Ahmedabad)

There is no contract of commission agent service with any of the commission agent, there is no person to whom payment of commission was made therefore, it is clear that no service provider i.e. foreign commission agent exists in the present case....

Read More

Customs cannot deny benefit where licensing authority not taking any action – SFIS benefit available to golf carts

EIH Associated Hotels Ltd. Vs Commr. of Customs (E) (CESTAT Mumbai)

EIH Associated Hotels Ltd. Vs Commr. of Customs (E) (CESTAT Mumbai) After considering the submissions of both sides, we find that in the first round of litigation when the original authority confirmed the demand and confiscated the goods with a redemption fine of Rs.1,00,000/-, the appellant filed appeal before the Commissioner (Appeals) ...

Read More

Declared import value cannot be rejected without passing speaking order

Commissioner of Customs Vs. Artex Textile Private Limited (CESTAT Delhi)

Commissioner of Customs Vs. Artex Textile Private Limited (CESTAT Delhi) we find that assessing officer have been making enhancement in a routine manner and the respondent who are regular importers are left with no choice but to sign on the dotted line for taking delivery of their goods to carry on their business, and also […]...

Read More

Service tax on GTA under RCM dropped, stating revenue neutrality

Ashirwad Foundaries Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of CGST & Central Excise (CESTAT Kolkata)

Ashirwad Foundaries Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of CGST & Central Excise (CESTAT Kolkata) CESTAT dropped the demand of Service tax on GTA under RCM, stating revenue neutrality.  Hon’ble Supreme Court in the case of CCE, Pune Vs Coca-Cola India Pvt. Ltd., 2007 (213) ELT 490 (SC) and CCE, Vadodara Vs Narmada Chematur Pharmaceuticals L...

Read More

Transaction Value to be accepted if there was reason to doubt truth or accuracy of such value

Aureole Atelier Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Customs (Preventive) (CESTAT Delhi)

Aureole Atelier Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Customs (Preventive) (CESTAT Delhi) Section 14 of the Customs Act provides that for the purpose of valuation the value of imported goods shall be the transaction value of such goods, i.e. to say, the price actually paid or payable for the goods when sold for export to India […]...

Read More

Service Tax not payable when paid to vendor instead of paying to Govt. under RCM

Mahanadi Coalfields Limited Vs Commissioner of CGST & CX (CESTAT Kolkata)

Mahanadi Coalfields Limited Vs Commissioner of CGST & CX (CESTAT Kolkata) The only issue involved in this appeal is whether the appellant is liable to deposit service tax under Security Service under reverse charge when the entire service tax amount has been reimbursed to the service provider who has deposited the same with the Govt. ...

Read More

Disputed CENVAT Credit paid during Service Tax Regime can be claimed as cash refund

Kaizen Organics Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Central Goods & Service Tax (CESTAT Delhi)

Kaizen Organics Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Central Goods & Service Tax (CESTAT Delhi) I find that the allegations in the show cause notice of taking irregular cenvat credit is based on a communication dated 30.02.2012 received from the Additional Commissioner, Customs & Central Excise, J & K, Jammu, stating that the several...

Read More

Service Tax on Expat salary reimbursement on Deputation

India Yamaha Motors Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Customs (CESTAT Delhi)

India Yamaha Motors Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Customs (CESTAT Delhi) For the demand relating to the period from 1 April, 2012 to 1  July, 2012 i.e. pre negative list period: The definition of manpower recruitment and supply agency is relevant for the impugned adjudication. Section 65(68) of the Act defines manpower recruitment and su...

Read More

Extended period cannot be invoked in case of revenue neutral situation

Star Alloys & Chemicals Pvt. Ltd. Vs. CCE & ST (CESTAT Delhi)

Star Alloys & Chemicals Pvt. Ltd. Vs. CCE & ST (CESTAT Delhi) CESTAT has held that in the case of GTA service, CENVAT credit is available, therefore extended period cannot be invoked. Learned Advocate submits that whatever service tax was payable by them on the said GTA services, the same was available as a credit […]...

Read More

No Service Tax on deputation of employees from a group company in Japan to Appellant in India

Mikuni India Pvt. Limited Vs Commissioner of Central Goods and Service Tax, Customs & Central Excise (CESTAT Delhi)

Mikuni India Pvt. Limited Vs Commissioner of Central Goods and (CESTAT Delhi) It is not in dispute that the issue involved in this appeal is similar to the issues involved in the appeal that came up for decision before the Division Bench of the Tribunal in M/s India Yamaha Motor Private Limited. The Division Bench […]...

Read More

CENVAT credit admissible for construction/setting up of landfill

Maharashtra Enviro Power Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise (CESTAT Mumbai)

The issue under consideration is whether denial of CENVAT credit availed by the appellant for construction/setting up of landfill is justified in law?...

Read More

Value declared in Bills of Entry cannot be rejected without following Rule 12ibid

Classic Marble Company Pvt. Ltd. Vs Commissioner of Customs (CESTAT Mumbai)

Classic Marble Company Vs Commissioner of Customs (CESTAT Mumbai) In this case The learned adjudicating authority has rejected the declared value in respect of the subject Bills of Entry under Section 14(1) ibid read with Rule 12 ibid and re-determined the assessable value under Section 14(1) ibid read with Rule 3(1) ibid, holding that su...

Read More

CESTAT Allowed Refund alongwith Interest against Service Tax Paid for Services Received in SEZ

Cummins Technologies India Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Commissioner (CESTAT Delhi)

The issue under consideration is regarding rejection of refund claimed by the appellant being service tax paid for the services received in the SEZ....

Read More

Service Tax Refund rejection based on Principles of Unjust Enrichment justified

The Madras Club Vs. Commissioner of G.S.T. & Central Excise (CESTAT Chennai)

The issue under consideration is regarding rejection of claim for refund of the service tax under Section 11B....

Read More

CESTAT explains Service Tax on Site Formation Services

M/s. Sem Construction Vs C.C.E. & S.T. (CESTAT Ahmedabad)

M/s. Sem Construction Vs C.C.E. & S.T. (CESTAT Ahmedabad) Brief facts of the case are that the appellant had been awarded a contract under agreement dated 01.04.2011 by M/s. Archelean Chemical Private Limited at Rann of Kutch for job of “metal spreading for supply un­course black Trap Rubble stone” and its spreading/dressing alon...

Read More

Revenue cannot Reject Classification of Goods of Assessee without Cogent Evidences

Asian Granito India Limited Vs. C.C.-Mundra (CESTAT Ahmedabad)

The issue under consideration is whether the Calcite Sand (Calcite Powder) is classifiable under CT 2503 9030 as mineral product or required to be classified under CTH 2836 5000 as a chemical?...

Read More

CBEC Letter cannot enlarge scope of exemption notifications

Sova Solar Ltd. Vs CCE & ST (CESTAT Kolkata)

Sova Solar Ltd. Vs CCE & ST (CESTAT Kolkata) It is pertinent to consider whether CBEC can enlarge or modify the scope of an exemption notification which is in the form of a subordinate legislation through a letter or circular. Taxing statutes have to be strictly construed and the power of taxation lies with the […]...

Read More

ST refund of tax paid on advance for which service not rendered due to merger cannot be denied

Lancor Holdings Limited Vs The Commissioner of G.S.T. and Central Excise (CESTAT Chennai)

Lancor Holdings Limited Vs The Commissioner of G.S.T. and Central Excise (CESTAT Chennai) There is no dispute as to the eligibility or otherwise for refund except the claim being rejected as barred by limitation. There is also no dispute that both the service provider and the service recipient having merged into a single entity, there [&h...

Read More

Cestat referred issue of ST reverses charge on salary of seconded employee’s to Larger Bench

M/s Canon India Pvt Ltd Vs Commissioner, Goods & Service Tax (CESTAT Chandigarh)

M/s Canon India Pvt Ltd Vs Commissioner, Goods & Service Tax (CESTAT Chandigarh) The issue involved in the present case is in respect of levy of service tax on the amounts paid as salary to expats under the taxable category of Manpower Supply Services. With effect from 01.07.2012, the law as introduced by the way […]...

Read More

Cenvat credit when portion of output service not liable to service tax

Metlife India Insurance Company Limited Vs Commissioner of Central Excise (CESTAT Bangalore)

Metlife India Insurance Company Limited Vs Commissioner of Central Excise (CESTAT Bangalore) CESTAT Bengaluru has held that Cenvat credit of service tax paid under reverse charge mechanism for availing services of insurance agents was available in a case when a portion of the premium amount (consideration towards output service), in case ...

Read More

Valuation – Advertisement & sales promotion expenses incurred by importer on own account, not includible

Indo Rubber and Plastic Works Vs Commissioner of Customs (CESTAT Delhi)

Indo Rubber and Plastic Works Vs Commissioner of Customs (CESTAT Delhi) CESTAT Delhi has held that in absence of any condition precedent, the expenditure by the importer-appellant on advertisement and sales promotion incurred on its own account and not for discharge for any obligation of the seller (foreign exporter) under the terms of th...

Read More

Child parts used in manufacture of parts of motor vehicle seats are classifiable under Heading 9401

Shiroki Auto Components India Pvt. Ltd. Vs Commissioner of Central Excise & ST (CESTAT Ahmedabad)

Shiroki Auto Components India Pvt. Ltd. Vs Commissioner of Central Excise & ST (CESTAT Ahmedabad) CESTAT Ahmedabad has held that the child parts imported by the appellant are classifiable under Tariff Item 9401 90 00 as parts of vehicle seats as declared by the importer-assessee and not under Tariff Item 8708 99 00 as parts […]...

Read More

Duty drawback cannot be denied for procedural irregularities

Bio Gen Extracts Pvt Ltd Vs Commissioner of Customs (CESTAT Bangalore)

Bio Gen Extracts Pvt Ltd Vs Commissioner of Customs (CESTAT Bangalore) We find that the appellant initially exported Phycocyanin and a part quantity of the same was rejected for quality reasons which was re-imported by him without payment of duty in terms of Notification No. 158/95-Cus dated 14.11.1995 on executing Bond with Bank Guarante...

Read More

EC & SHEC balance as on 30.06.2017, which could not be transitioned to GST, is refunable: CESTAT

Bharat Heavy Electricals Ltd. Vs Commissioner CGST, Central Excise & Customs, (CESTAT Delhi)

Bharat Heavy Electricals Ltd. Vs Commissioner CGST, Central Excise & Customs, (CESTAT Delhi) There is no dispute that on 01/07/2017, the cesses credit validly stood in the accounts of the assessee and very much utilizable under the existing provisions. The appellants could not carry over the same under the GST regime. Thus the appella...

Read More

Customs duty can be demanded only by officer having jurisdiction on import

Samudra Dredgers (UK) Ltd. Vs Commissioner of Customs (CESTAT Bangalore)

The issue under consideration is whether the dredger is covered as a foreign flag vessel and liable for payment of custom duty?...

Read More

No ST under RCM levied on Indian bank acting as a mediator between Exporter & Foreign Banker

State Bank of Bikaner & Jaipur Vs Commissioner of Central Excise & Service Tax (CESTAT Delhi)

whether service tax can be levied on reverse charge mechanism basis on an Indian bank acting as a mediator between an Indian exporter and the foreign banker representing foreign importer?...

Read More

CESTAT explains exercise of Option under Cenvat Credit Rule 6(3)(i)

Tata Steel Ltd. Vs CCEx. & S.Tax (CESTAT Kolkata)

The issue under consideration is whether the appellant, Tata Steel, was entitled to avail option under Rule 6(3)(ii) of the Cenvat Credit Rules?...

Read More

No Service Tax on Octroi Collection in discharge of Sovereign Privilege

Traffic Manager Vs Commissioner of Service Tax (CESTAT Mumbai)

The issue under consideration is whether the service tax is applicable to the collection of Octroi for entry of goods in the discharge of sovereign privilege?...

Read More

Actual Cost of Production as Assessable Value will be charged in Inter-Unit Transfer of Goods

Hindalco Industries Ltd. Vs Commissioner of Central Excise (Appeals) (CESTAT Kolkata)

The issue under consideration is whether assessee is justified in reducing the assessable value to the actual cost of production in the inter-unit transfer of goods?...

Read More

Benefit of Basic Custom Duty exemption on import of ‘GoPro HERO5 Black’ Action Camera Allowed

Creative Peripherals & Distribution Ltd Vs Commissioner of Customs (CESTAT Mumbai)

whether assessing officer is correct in rejecting the benefit of Basic Customs Duty exemption claimed by the appellant on the import of ‘GoPro HERO5 Black’ Action Camera?...

Read More

Composite Contract can be subject to service tax only under Work Contract Service after 01 June 2007

Kunnel Engineers and Contractors Pvt. Ltd. Vs C.C.,C.E.& S.T (CESTAT Bangalore)

The issue under consideration is whether the service would continue to be classified under CICS/CCS and changing the classification into WCS midway is permissible or not?...

Read More

No ST on Reimbursement of expenses on behalf of service recipients

Awasthi Brothers Vs Principal Commissioner,Customs, Central Excise & Service Tax (CESTAT Delhi)

The issue under consideration is whether expenses received as reimbursement of expenses made on behalf of service recipients can form part of the assessable value and service tax will be applicable on it?...

Read More

No Custom Penalty for goods cleared by officers after signing Bond

Bharat Tissues Pvt. Ltd. Vs C.C. (CESTAT Bangalore)

Penalty under Section 114A and other penal provisions cannot be invoked when the goods were permitted to be cleared by the officers. However, the Revenue will be free to recover duty along with interest in terms of the Notification....

Read More

No Service Tax on Commission or Agency Fee remitted to entities for handling Vessels outside India

Bharat Petroleum Corporation Ltd. Vs Commissioner of Service Tax (CESTAT Mumbai)

The issue under consideration is whether the commission or agency fee remitted to entities for handling vessels outside India are exempt from service tax as per Section 78 of Finance Act, 1994? ...

Read More

Cenvat Credit of ITC attributable to taxable output & use of Formula

Dell International Services India Pvt. Ltd. Vs C.C.E. & S.T. (CESTAT Bangalore)

The issue under consideration is whether ITC attributable to taxable output included in formula of determining ITC of exempted goods or services?...

Read More

No Service Tax on advanced fire-fighting training & elementary first aid course

Cochin Shipyard Ltd. Vs CCEx. & S.Tax (CESTAT Bangalore)

The issue under consideration is whether service tax is applicable on the fee income earned from the students under the category of “Commercial Training or Coaching Services”?...

Read More

No Service Tax on Loan Foreclosure charges collected by banks & NBFCs- CESTAT Larger Bench

Commissioner of Service Tax Vs Repco Home Finance Ltd. (CESTAT Chennai)

Foreclosure charges collected by the banks and non banking financial companies on premature termination of loans are not leviable to service tax under 'banking and other financial services' as defined under section 65 (12) of the Finance Act...

Read More

CESTAT warns Commissioner (A) of penal action for not respecting its decision

Park Nonwovens Pvt. Ltd. Vs CCE (CESTAT Chandigarh)

Commissioner (A) has not respected the order of this Tribunal required to be penalized. Therefore, the ld. Commissioner (A) is directed to take care in future to avoid any penal action from this Tribunal....

Read More

Benefit of SEZ unit can’t be denied merely because registered office is situated in DTA i.e. outside SEZ

M/s Adani Power Ltd. Vs Commissioner of Service Tax (CESTAT Ahmedabad)

whether the commissioner is correct in denying the benefit of SEZ unit on the basis that the registered office is situated in DTA i.e. outside the SEZ?...

Read More

Excise Duty Recovery for Shortage of goods in Absence of Evidences not valid

N R Sponge Private Limited Vs Commissioner Customs (CESTAT Delhi)

whether the Central Excise Officers are correct in levying duty on account of discrepancies in the records of the appellant and shortages in the stock of raw-material as well as finished goods?...

Read More

No Service Tax on construction of residential complex prior to 01.06.2010

Manjeera Constructions Ltd. Vs Commissioner of Central Excise, Customs & Service Tax (CESTAT Hyderabad)

The issue under consideration is whether service tax will be levied on promoters/builders/developers prior to 01.06.2010 in respect of the construction of the residential complex?...

Read More

No service Tax on Down linking of Signals as same not falls under Definition of Broadcasting

Vedic Broadcasting Limited Vs Commissioner of Central Excise & Service Tax (CESTAT Delhi)

whether the charges paid for a service provided by Intelsat (situated outside India) to the Appellant covered under the head broadcasting service and tax in the hands of the Appellant under the reverse charge mechanism?...

Read More

Prior to A.Y. 2015-16 word ‘a’ employed under Section 54 can include plural residential houses

Tilokchand & Sons Vs ITO (Madras High Court)

If the word 'a' as employed under Section 54 prior to its amendment and substitution by the words 'one' with effect from 01.04.2015 could not include plural units of residential houses, there was no need to amend the said provisions by Finance Act No.2 of 2014 with effect from 01.04.2015 which the Legislature specifically made it clear to...

Read More

No Service on Transfer of goods by hiring vessel

Universal Dredging and Reclamation Corporation Ltd. Vs Commissioner of CGST & Central Excise (CESTAT Chennai)

The issue under consideration is whether the transfer of goods is by way of hiring the charter vessel is taxable under  Service Tax as declared service?...

Read More

Know How’ is not IPR and not liable to service tax

Modi-Mundipharma Beauty Products Pvt. Ltd. Vs Commissioner of Service Tax (CESTAT Delhi)

Grant of exclusive right to assessee by Mauritius Revlon to use the 'know how' in any plant in accordance with the processes, specifications and recipes thereof in connection with the manufacture, marketing, sale  and distribution of Revlon  Products would not fall in the definition of "intellectual property right‟ so as to make it ta...

Read More

No ST on brokerage from overseas reinsurance even if amount received in Rupees

Bharat Re-insurance Brokers Pvt. Ltd Vs Commissioner of Central Excise, Customs and Service Tax (CESTAT Hyderabad)

The issue under consideration is whether the contention if the appellant is correct that they are not liable to pay service tax on brokerage received from overseas reinsurance on the ground that the service falls under the category of export of service?...

Read More

No service tax on construction services prior to introduction of Works Contract Service in June 2007

Lee Builders Vs Commissioner of Central Excise (CESTAT Bangalore)

No service tax can be demanded on construction services prior to introduction of „Works Contract Service” in June 2007 wherein there is a supply of goods and service....

Read More

Service by NSDL to depository participants liable to Service Tax

National Securities Depository Ltd. Vs Commissioner of Service Tax (CESTAT Mumbai)

Services provided by NSDL to depository participants are aptly of 'provision and transfer of information and data processing', classifiable under (vii) of Banking and Financial Services as defined under Section 65(12) of Finance Act, 1994;...

Read More

No service tax on KIADB for discharging statutory function

Karnataka Industrial Areas Development Board Vs Commissioner of Central Tax (CESTAT Bangalore)

Assessee was not liable to pay the service tax at all as it was a statutory body discharging the statutory function as per the statute Karnataka Industrial Areas Development (KIAD) Act, 1966 and hence was not liable to pay service tax....

Read More

CENVAT credit of service tax paid for insurance service received by banks from DICGC was available

South Indian Bank Vs Commissioner of Customs, Central Excise and Service Tax (CESTAT Bangalore)

Insurance service provided by Deposit Insurance Corporation to banks was an input service and CENVAT credit of service tax paid for this service received by the banks from the Deposit Insurance Corporation could be availed by the banks for rendering output services....

Read More

In absence of ‘intent to conceal’ cannot be construed as smuggled: CESTAT

Ahamed Gani Natchiar Vs Commissioner of Customs (CESTAT Chennai)

CESTAT directs Customs Authorities to return confiscated gold to Foreign National- lack of evidence and flimsy investigation by the authorities. Held that in the absence of 'intent to conceal' cannot be construed as smuggled....

Read More

Higher discount justified if Goods imports in Bulk & maintain inventory by incurring Additional Cost

Lutron GL Sales & Services Pvt. Ltd. Vs Commissioner of Customs (CESTAT Delhi)

Lutron GL Sales & Services Pvt. Ltd. Vs Commissioner of Customs (CESTAT Delhi) The issue under consideration is whether the percentage of enhancement to the transaction value ordered by the Deputy Commissioner of Customs is justified in law? In the present case, the appellant M/s Lutron GL Sales & Services Pvt. Limited imports lig...

Read More

Customs Valuation Rules- Invoice price cannot be rejected without cogent reasons

Guru Rajendra Metalloys India Pvt Ltd Vs C.C. (CESTAT Ahmedabad)

CESTAT are of the clear view that merely based on DGOV circular also, value cannot be enhanced which is without authority of law. It is clearly held that DGOV circular cannot override the provisions of Valuation Rules. ...

Read More

Refund can’t be rejected merely because registration number not mentioned in invoice

Adani Enterprises Limited Vs Commissioner of Central Excise & ST (CESTAT Ahmedabad) ST No. 22 of 2010

The issue under consideration is whether it is correct to reject the refund on the basis that the registration number of appellant not mention in invoice?...

Read More

Cenvat Credit cannot be denied for Invoices prior to ISD registration

Mafatlal Industries Limited Vs Commissioner of Central Excise & ST (CESTAT Ahmedabad)

Mafatlal Industries Limited Vs Commissioner of Central Excise & ST (CESTAT Ahmedabad) Demand of Rs. 39,60,634/- was confirmed on the ground that same was wrongly availed on ISD invoices issued by the appellant’s Ahmedabad and Mumbai branch for services availed prior to the date of ISD registration was granted for the said unit. ...

Read More

Electricity bill paid on behalf of client is not ‘Business Auxiliary Service’

Ninan Jacob Associates Vs Commissioner Of Central Tax & Central Excise (CESTAT Bangalore)

The issue under consideration is regarding classification of services, whether electricity bill paid on behalf of client can be classified as ‘Business Auxiliary Service’?...

Read More

No Service Tax if no monetary consideration charged for Services

Moti Talkies Vs Commissioner of Service Tax (CESTAT Delhi)

Whether department is correct in charging service tax on various services provided to film distributors by assessee  without charging any consideration....

Read More

CESTAT on Refund of CVD & SAD – Paid to regularize import under Advance Authorization

Servo Packaging Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of GST & CE, Puducherry (CESTAT Chennai)

In this case, the Hon’ble Tribunal decided in favour of the Appellant with respect to availability of the Cenvat Credit. Once it is admitted fact that the Appellant was eligible to avail Cenvat Credit of the duties i.e., CVD and SAD, the Appellant is eligible to claim refund of the said Cenvat Credit in terms of Section 142(6) of the CG...

Read More

No penalty if tax alongwith interest paid before issuance of SCN

YCH Logistics (India) Pvt. Ltd Vs C.C.E & C.S.T (CESTAT Bangalore)

YCH Logistics (India) Pvt. Ltd Vs C.C.E & C.S.T (CESTAT Bangalore) The services imported by the assessee are taxable services and are chargeable to Service Tax but they had not paid the Service Tax applicable on the same. The assessee were liable to pay the Service Tax on import of such services as a recipient […]...

Read More

Classification under Central Excise Tariff needs to be made after perusing basic technical specifications of vehicles

Man Trucks India Pvt. Ltd. Vs CCE (CESTAT Delhi)

Man Trucks India Pvt. Ltd. Vs CCE (CESTAT Delhi) After perusing the catalogue of the vehicle, it is fairly obvious that such vehicles manufactured by the appellant are meant to carry loads and capable of off-loading but the same are not machines exclusively meant for off-road use. We have also perused the clarification obtained by [&helli...

Read More

Dross and Skimming were nonferrous metal; Excise duty not payable

C.C.E. & S.T. Vs Hindalco Industries Limited (CESTAT Ahmedabad)

C.C.E. & S.T. Vs Hindalco Industries Limited (CESTAT Ahmedabad) Dross and Skimming were nonferrous metal for any such by-product or waste which are non-excisable goods and are cleared for a consideration from the factory need to be treated like exempted goods for the purpose of reversal of credit of input or input service in terms [&h...

Read More

Date of filing of bill of entry is not date of import

Radhe Exim Pvt. Ltd. Vs C.C. (CESTAT Ahmedabad)

Radhe Exim Pvt. Ltd. Vs C.C. (CESTAT Ahmedabad) From the plain reading of the definition of import it is clear that when the goods enter into territorial water of India that is the stage of completion of import into India and not the date of filling of Bill of Entry, therefore, if the appellant possess […]...

Read More

Discount given for non-provision of certain service to foreign buyer not liable under BAS

MAN Trucks India Pvt. Ltd. Vs Commissioner, Central Excise, Customs & Service Tax (CESTAT Delhi)

MAN Trucks India Pvt. Ltd. Vs CCE (CESTAT Delhi) In a case where the assessee had exported goods to sister concern who in turn had sold them to buyers there, with the foreign importer being responsible for providing after sales services, CESTAT Delhi has held that the discount given in consideration for non-provision of warranty […...

Read More

Cenvat Credit not reversible in absence of Physical removal of capital goods

Vodafone Mobile Services Limited Vs CCE&ST (CESTAT Chandigarh)

Cenvat held that appellant is not required to reverse Cenvat credit as the capital goods have not been physically removed from the premises where they were initially installed....

Read More

Extended period of limitation could not be invoked by Department if no suppression & misrepresentation of facts

Kent Chemicals Private Ltd Vs Commissioner (CESTAT Delhi)

Kent Chemicals Private Ltd Vs Commissioner (CESTAT Delhi) The proven discharge of liability by the service provider, the same is opined to be a sufficient cause for the appellant to have a bonafide impression of him to no more be liable to pay the service tax even under reverse charge mechanism. The allegation as that […]...

Read More

Goods Manufactured for use by other Manufacturers cannot be subjected to Excise U/s. 4A

T.M. Tyres Limited Vs Commissioner of Central Excise (CESTAT Hyderabad)

T.M. Tyres Limited Vs Commissioner of Central Excise (CESTAT Hyderabad) It is an admitted fact on record that the appellant is engaged in the manufacture of Butyl rubber inner tubes and such product by itself is separately identifiable and is a distinct Marketable product. It cannot be said that the product manufactured by the appellant [...

Read More

Demand for Cost Recovery Charges was non sustainable

Goodearth Maritime Limited Vs Commissioner of Customs (CESTAT Ahmedabad)

Since no services were being specially provided by the customs officials to the custodians at a customs port or customs airport, to enable them to collect any fee, from such a custodian thus, High Court not only set-aside the demand of Cost Recovery charges but even held that Regulation 5(2) of Regulation 2009 was illegal....

Read More

Transportation of iron ore from mines site to appellant’s crusher plant not falls under GTA service

East India Minerals Limited Vs Commissioner of Central Excise (CESTAT Kolkata)

Activity of transportation of iron ore lumps from the mines site to the appellant’s crusher plant does not constitute GTA service in terms of Sec.65(105)(zzp) read with Sec.65(50b) of the Finance Act, 1994....

Read More

Expenses incurred on sponsorship and endorsement was not includible in transaction value of imports

Commissioner of Customs Vs Adidas India Marketing Pvt. Ltd. (CESTAT Delhi)

Sponsorship and endorsement expenses paid by Adidas India to various athletes and players in India were not includable in the assessable value of the goods imported by Adidas India by invoking rule 10(1)(e) of the Customs Valuation (Determination of Value of Imported Goods) Rules 2007....

Read More

VCES benefit cannot be denied for mere Clerical error

Shivani Textiles Limited Vs Commissioner of Central Tax (CESTAT Delhi)

The issue in this appeal is whether the benefit of VCES-Voluntary Compliance encouragement Scheme, 2013 have been rightly denied to the appellant on the basis of clerical error in filing the declaration?...

Read More

Broadcasting Agencies not liable to pay service tax on Additional Consideration Received as Surrogates under BAS

Commissioner of Service Tax Vs One Entertainment Network Pvt. Ltd. (CESTAT Mumbai)

The respondents are, or have been, 'surrogate' providers of `broadcasting' service in India, taxable under section 65(105)(zk) of Finance Act, 1994 since 2001 (and, more especially, with retrospective effect of the amendment incorporated in 2002), in the hands of `broadcasting agency' as defined in section 65(16) of Finance Act, 1994....

Read More

No Cenvat Credit denial for Clerical Error in mentioning Vehicle Number

Cubex Tubings Ltd. Vs Commissioner of Customs, Central Excise Central Excise and Service Tax (CESTAT Hyderabad)

Cubex Tubings Ltd. Vs Commissioner of Customs, Central Excise Central Excise and Service Tax (CESTAT Hyderabad) The issue in dispute is whether the appellant assessee is entitled to CENVAT Credit on the disputed eight invoices or otherwise. It is the case of the Revenue that no material was received by the appellant against these invoices...

Read More

Recovery of Redemption fine from Sale Proceeds- CESTAT refers matter to Larger Bench

Commissioner of Customs Vs Oriental Trimex Ltd. (CESTAT Delhi)

Commissioner of Customs Vs Oriental Trimex Ltd. (CESTAT Delhi) If the confiscated goods allowed to redeemed on a redemption fine then the sale proceeds will be paid only after deduction of such fine In the given case the importer appellant is engaged in the business of import of marble from various countries into India and […]...

Read More

Commissioner (A) has power to remand the matter to Adjudicating Authority

Commissioner of Central Excise & ST Vs Adani Power Limited (CESTAT Ahmedabad)

Commissioner of Central Excise & ST Vs Adani Power Limited (CESTAT Ahmedabad) As regards the issue that whether Commissioner (Appeals) has power to remand the matter to Adjudicating Authority, we find that this being a case of refund of service tax, clearly covered by the ratio of Hon’ble Gujarat High Court judgment in the case [&he...

Read More

Area based exemption under central excise available where new unit successor to previous unit and to adjacent units.

Spring Dells Vs Commissioner of Central Goods & Service Tax (CESTAT Delhi)

Spring Dells Vs Commissioner of Central Goods & Service Tax (CESTAT Delhi) Conclusion: Assessee was entitled to the area-based exemption for the reason that it was admittedly the successor of the previous unit entitled to the exemption and all the units/sheds were located in one private industrial complex which could be said to be adj...

Read More

Browse All Categories

CA, CS, CMA (5,053)
Company Law (6,720)
Custom Duty (8,087)
DGFT (4,389)
Excise Duty (4,411)
Fema / RBI (4,438)
Finance (4,699)
Income Tax (35,128)
SEBI (3,757)
Service Tax (3,627)

Search Posts by Date

December 2020
M T W T F S S
 123456
78910111213
14151617181920
21222324252627
28293031