Follow Us:

Rule 10A Not Applicable Due to Absence of Job Work Relationship: CESTAT Mumbai

UBR Legal Advocates 16 Dec 2025 387 Views 1 comment Print
Warning: Undefined variable $show_all_cats in /home/taxguru/public_html/wp-content/themes/tgv5/single.php on line 63
Excise Duty |
Warning: Undefined variable $show_all_types in /home/taxguru/public_html/wp-content/themes/tgv5/single.php on line 71
Judiciary

Warning: Undefined variable $all_cats in /home/taxguru/public_html/wp-content/themes/tgv5/single.php on line 80

Case Law Details

Case Name : BBM Heavy Machinery Private Limited Vs Commissioner of GST & Central Excise (CESTAT Mumbai)
Related Assessment Year :
Warning: Undefined array key 3 in /home/taxguru/public_html/wp-content/themes/tgv5/single.php on line 95
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.

BBM Heavy Machinery Private Limited Vs Commissioner of GST & Central Excise (CESTAT Mumbai)

Whether the department apply Rule 10A and treat the appellant as a job worker for valuation purposes?

The appellant manufacture heavy machinery/equipment. Business is run by a joint venture (JV); agreement dated 19.07.2011 entered into with M/s SMS Meer India Limited, an Indian company and M/s Officine Meccaniche BBM SPA, Italy. The department alleged that appellants had manufactured final products out of certain raw materials supplied by M/s SMS, but failed to pa

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Comments are closed.

Ads Free tax News and Updates
Search Post by Date
February 2026
M T W T F S S
 1
2345678
9101112131415
16171819202122
232425262728