Rule 10A Not Applicable Due to Absence of Job Work Relationship: CESTAT Mumbai
UBR Legal Advocates
16 Dec 2025
387 Views
1 comment
Print
Warning: Undefined variable $show_all_cats in /home/taxguru/public_html/wp-content/themes/tgv5/single.php on line 63
Excise Duty |
Warning: Undefined variable $show_all_types in /home/taxguru/public_html/wp-content/themes/tgv5/single.php on line 71
Judiciary
Warning: Undefined variable $show_all_cats in /home/taxguru/public_html/wp-content/themes/tgv5/single.php on line 63
Excise Duty |
Warning: Undefined variable $show_all_types in /home/taxguru/public_html/wp-content/themes/tgv5/single.php on line 71
Judiciary
Warning: Undefined variable $all_cats in /home/taxguru/public_html/wp-content/themes/tgv5/single.php on line 80
Case Law Details
Case Name : BBM Heavy Machinery Private Limited Vs Commissioner of GST & Central Excise (CESTAT Mumbai)
Related Assessment Year :
Warning: Undefined array key 3 in /home/taxguru/public_html/wp-content/themes/tgv5/single.php on line 95
Warning: Undefined array key 3 in /home/taxguru/public_html/wp-content/themes/tgv5/single.php on line 95
Courts :
All CESTAT CESTAT Mumbai
Become a Premium member to Download.
If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
BBM Heavy Machinery Private Limited Vs Commissioner of GST & Central Excise (CESTAT Mumbai)
Whether the department apply Rule 10A and treat the appellant as a job worker for valuation purposes?
The appellant manufacture heavy machinery/equipment. Business is run by a joint venture (JV); agreement dated 19.07.2011 entered into with M/s SMS Meer India Limited, an Indian company and M/s Officine Meccaniche BBM SPA, Italy. The department alleged that appellants had manufactured final products out of certain raw materials supplied by M/s SMS, but failed to pa
Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.
Kindly Refer to
Privacy Policy &
Complete Terms of Use and Disclaimer.


Comments are closed.