Income Tax : The Tribunal held that cash deposits during demonetisation cannot be treated as unexplained when backed by audited books, invoices...
Income Tax : ITAT Bangalore held that profit cannot be estimated arbitrarily when regular books of account are maintained and not rejected unde...
Income Tax : A large spousal gift exemption was denied due to failure in proving genuineness, creditworthiness, and source of funds. The ruling...
Income Tax : Income without satisfactory explanation is taxed at a special high rate under Section 115BBE. The provisions place strict liabilit...
Income Tax : ITAT held spousal gift taxable under Section 68 due to lack of evidence on genuineness, bank trail, and donor capacity despite Sec...
Finance : The Supreme Court upheld a Will executed in favour of the testator’s sister despite objections from his wife and children. The C...
Income Tax : Tribunal reiterated that credits brought forward from earlier financial years cannot ordinarily be taxed under Section 68 in subse...
Goods and Services Tax : Allahabad High Court ruled that while authorities could verify documents during transit, absence of an e-Tax Invoice did not confe...
Income Tax : The Tribunal observed that the assessee had repaid the unsecured loan along with interest after deducting TDS and the lender had o...
Income Tax : Tribunal ruled that future projections under DCF method cannot be tested solely against later actual financial performance. It obs...
Income Tax : Assessing Officers should follow the sequence as noted below for applying provisions of section 68 of the Act: Step 1: Whether the...
ITAT Chandigarh held that addition invoking the deeming provisions of section 69 r.w.s. 115BBE of the Income Tax Act unjustified as nature and source of undisclosed income/ investment duly explained by the assessee.
In Brightstar Vincom Pvt Ltd Vs ITO, Kolkata ITAT emphasizes independent inquiry by AO before adding under section 68 of IT Act.
ITAT Delhi’s order on Trident Towers Pvt. Ltd vs ACIT addresses the deletion of addition under section 68 of the Income Tax Act, citing submission of requisite documents.
In Bharat Agro Industries Vs DCIT, New Delhi ITAT questions the logic of treating sales as bogus when purchases are genuine and stock is accepted.
New Delhi ITAT explains that Explanation 3 to Sec 147 can’t justify additions unrelated to reasons for reopening. Read the detailed analysis.
ITAT Delhi held that in absence of mentioning the date of handing over of material, date of satisfaction note shall be considered for the purpose of assumption of jurisdiction u/s 153C of the Act and completion of assessment thereafter.
Trinity Global Enterprises Ltd. vs. ITO: No disallowance under 40A(2) for supervision and risk management charges. Detailed analysis and conclusions provided.
Bombay High Court rules in favor of Sanathan Textile Pvt Ltd, stating no service tax is liable on ocean freight. Read the detailed analysis and conclusion here.
In Hemant Taneja Vs State Of U.P. case, Allahabad High Court overturns GST penalty, citing proper documentation provided by petitioner. Analysis & implications discussed.
Delhi’s ITAT dismisses revenue’s appeal, upholding CIT(A)’s deletion of additions under Section 68 of the Income Tax Act due to lack of cash payment evidence.
