Income Tax : The Tribunal held that cash deposits during demonetisation cannot be treated as unexplained when backed by audited books, invoices...
Income Tax : ITAT Bangalore held that profit cannot be estimated arbitrarily when regular books of account are maintained and not rejected unde...
Income Tax : A large spousal gift exemption was denied due to failure in proving genuineness, creditworthiness, and source of funds. The ruling...
Income Tax : Income without satisfactory explanation is taxed at a special high rate under Section 115BBE. The provisions place strict liabilit...
Income Tax : ITAT held spousal gift taxable under Section 68 due to lack of evidence on genuineness, bank trail, and donor capacity despite Sec...
Finance : The Supreme Court upheld a Will executed in favour of the testator’s sister despite objections from his wife and children. The C...
Income Tax : Tribunal reiterated that credits brought forward from earlier financial years cannot ordinarily be taxed under Section 68 in subse...
Goods and Services Tax : Allahabad High Court ruled that while authorities could verify documents during transit, absence of an e-Tax Invoice did not confe...
Income Tax : The Tribunal observed that the assessee had repaid the unsecured loan along with interest after deducting TDS and the lender had o...
Income Tax : Tribunal ruled that future projections under DCF method cannot be tested solely against later actual financial performance. It obs...
Income Tax : Assessing Officers should follow the sequence as noted below for applying provisions of section 68 of the Act: Step 1: Whether the...
In the landmark Mudhol Pattina Sahakari Sangh Niyamita vs. ACIT case, ITAT Bangalore held additions under Section 68 need examination of cash deposit source.
Read the detailed analysis of the Jharkhand High Court’s decision upholding income tax additions due to failure in proving the genuineness of creditors providing cash loans.
Uttarakhand High Court held that invocation of proceedings u/s. 129 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 for minor infraction i.e. for not carrying any delivery challan unjustified as there is no intention to evade tax.
Delhi ITAT rules in DCIT Vs Nishit Capinvest Pvt Ltd that meager control over penny stock companies doesn’t question the source of income’s legitimacy.
Kerala High Court remands matter for readjudication, ruling Income Tax addition invalid without notice on unsecured loans from five individuals.
ITAT Mumbai rules Sec 68 invoked only if taxpayer can’t explain credits in books, highlighting the importance of genuine transactions for AY 2011-12, 2012-13.
Mumbai ITAT rules in favor of Speco Infrastructure, maintaining deletions of tax additions by appellate authority in a reasoned order for AY 2013-14.
ITAT Bangalore rules in favor of Minority Co-op. Credit Society Ltd. on interest income deduction under section 80P(2)(d) from unlicensed co-op bank investments for AY 2017-18.
Allahabad High Court upholds the deletion of an income tax addition under Section 68 for Paswara Papers Ltd., affirming the genuineness of the transaction.
In the case of Rajesh Lakhmshi Nisar Vs ITO, Mumbai ITAT admitted additional evidence, emphasizing taxpayers shouldn’t be penalized for not submitting material evidence.
