Sponsored
    Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Aniljit Singh Arora Vs DCIT (ITAT Chandigarh)
Appeal Number : ITA No. 515/Chd/2023
Date of Judgement/Order : 15/02/2024
Related Assessment Year : 2019-20
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sponsored

Aniljit Singh Arora Vs DCIT (ITAT Chandigarh)

ITAT Chandigarh held that addition invoking the deeming provisions of section 69 r.w.s. 115BBE of the Income Tax Act unjustified as nature and source of undisclosed income/ investment duly explained by the assessee.

Facts- During the course of survey, AO made addition towards unexplained investment u/s. 69 being short fall in the value of investment in the building declared by the assessee. Further, referring to the surrender letter, AO also made addition towards unexplained investment u/s. 69 r.w.s 115BBE of the Act on account of understated expenditure involved in construction of the hospital building.

CIT(A) upheld the action of AO. Being aggrieved, the present appeal is filed.

Conclusion- Held that the nature and source of such unaccounted investment in the hospital building is arising out of assessee’s unaccounted professional receipts for the year under consideration. No doubt, these transactions were not fully recorded in the books of accounts at the time of survey thus qualify as unrecorded transactions satisfying one of the essential conditions, at the same time, we find that based on appreciation of assessee’s statement, the corroborative material and other attending circumstances available on record, the assessee has provided a reasonable and acceptable explanation about the nature and source of such unrecorded transactions as that of professional receipts and the necessary nexus with assessee’s profession has been established, it cannot be said that these are unexplained transactions, thus, doesn’t satisfy the second condition for invoking the deeming provisions of Section 69 of the Act. Therefore, we are of the considered view that there was no justifiable basis on the part of the AO in applying the provisions of Section 69 r/w Section 115BBE of the Act to the surrendered business income of the assessee which has been duly offered in the return of income.

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Sponsored

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sponsored
Sponsored
Search Post by Date
July 2024
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
293031