Section 40A(2)(b)

Sorry No Post Found
Sorry No Post Found

Expense can be disallowed u/s 40A(2)(b) & Not the Receipts

KEC-PLR-KPIPL-JV Vs ITO ( ITAT Delhi) - ITAT states that, in the present case, it is an admitted position that the AO made the addition by invoking the provisions of Section 40A(2)(b) of the Act which are applicable to the expenses considered to be excessive or unreasonable having regard to the fair market value of the goods/services or f...

Read More

Foreign Travel expense of director having nexus with business allowable

Laxmi Ventures (India) Ltd. Vs DCIT (ITAT Mumbai) - Laxmi Ventures (India) Ltd. Vs DCIT (ITAT Mumbai) The issue under consideration is whether disallowance made against the foreign expense incurred for the foreign travelling of the officer is justified in law? ITAT states that, the assessee had debited a sum on account of foreign travelling expenses ...

Read More

Commission to Director cannot be disallowed without examining appointment terms

Kirloskar Oil Engines Limited Vs JCIT (ITAT Pune) - Kirloskar Oil Engines Limited Vs JCIT (ITAT Pune) The issue under consideration is whether the disallowance made for commission paid to director u/s. 40A(2) is justified? ITAT states that, the assessee is against disallowance of commission paid to Shri Atul Kirloskar u/s. 40A(2) of the Act. It is an...

Read More

No addition for Cash payments in excess of prescribed limit as Assesse given undertaking for not claiming that expenditure

Kalyan Lok Nirman (P) Ltd. Vs DCIT (ITAT Indore) - whether the disallowance u/s 40A(3) of the Act for the alleged payment in cash in excess of the limit prescribed u/s 40A(3) of the Act for making payment for purchase of land is justified in law?...

Read More

Section 40A(2)(b) cannot be invoked merely for Unregistered agreement

DE Diamond Electric India Pvt Limited Vs ACIT (ITAT Delhi) - DE Diamond Electric India Pvt Limited Vs ACIT (ITAT Delhi) One of the ground taken by the AO for invoking section 40A(2)(b) is the agreement between the parties has not been registered. In our opinion, an unregistered agreement cannot be a ground for invoking provisions of section 40A(2)(b) of the A...

Read More

CBDT notifies more modes of e-payments; 6DD limit reduced to ₹ 10000

Notification No. 08/2020-Income-Tax [G.S.R. 56(E)] - (29/01/2020) - Notification No. 8/2020-Income-Tax- CBDT has notified Other electronic modes by inserting New Income TAx Rule 6ABBA. It also amended marginal heading of rule 6DD and in rule 6DD for the words ‘account payee bank draft, exceeds twenty thousand rupees’, the words, figures and letters ̵...

Read More

Section 40A(2)(b)’s Popular Posts

Recent Posts in "Section 40A(2)(b)"

Expense can be disallowed u/s 40A(2)(b) & Not the Receipts

KEC-PLR-KPIPL-JV Vs ITO ( ITAT Delhi)

ITAT states that, in the present case, it is an admitted position that the AO made the addition by invoking the provisions of Section 40A(2)(b) of the Act which are applicable to the expenses considered to be excessive or unreasonable having regard to the fair market value of the goods/services or facilities for which the payment is made....

Read More

Foreign Travel expense of director having nexus with business allowable

Laxmi Ventures (India) Ltd. Vs DCIT (ITAT Mumbai)

Laxmi Ventures (India) Ltd. Vs DCIT (ITAT Mumbai) The issue under consideration is whether disallowance made against the foreign expense incurred for the foreign travelling of the officer is justified in law? ITAT states that, the assessee had debited a sum on account of foreign travelling expenses for Europe visit and a sum on account [&...

Read More

Commission to Director cannot be disallowed without examining appointment terms

Kirloskar Oil Engines Limited Vs JCIT (ITAT Pune)

Kirloskar Oil Engines Limited Vs JCIT (ITAT Pune) The issue under consideration is whether the disallowance made for commission paid to director u/s. 40A(2) is justified? ITAT states that, the assessee is against disallowance of commission paid to Shri Atul Kirloskar u/s. 40A(2) of the Act. It is an undisputed fact that in earlier assessm...

Read More

No addition for Cash payments in excess of prescribed limit as Assesse given undertaking for not claiming that expenditure

Kalyan Lok Nirman (P) Ltd. Vs DCIT (ITAT Indore)

whether the disallowance u/s 40A(3) of the Act for the alleged payment in cash in excess of the limit prescribed u/s 40A(3) of the Act for making payment for purchase of land is justified in law?...

Read More

Section 40A(2)(b) cannot be invoked merely for Unregistered agreement

DE Diamond Electric India Pvt Limited Vs ACIT (ITAT Delhi)

DE Diamond Electric India Pvt Limited Vs ACIT (ITAT Delhi) One of the ground taken by the AO for invoking section 40A(2)(b) is the agreement between the parties has not been registered. In our opinion, an unregistered agreement cannot be a ground for invoking provisions of section 40A(2)(b) of the Act in absence of requirement […]...

Read More

No disallowance for payment to related parties without demonstrating that payment made was excessive and unreasonable

Motilal Laxmichand Sanghavi Vs ACIT (ITAT Mumbai)

Even though assessee had made payments to related parties, yet in view of fact that there was no material on record to demonstrate that payment made was excessive and unreasonable having regard to market rate, disallowance made under section 40A(2) by AO was to be deleted....

Read More

CBDT notifies more modes of e-payments; 6DD limit reduced to ₹ 10000

Notification No. 08/2020-Income-Tax [G.S.R. 56(E)] (29/01/2020)

Notification No. 8/2020-Income-Tax- CBDT has notified Other electronic modes by inserting New Income TAx Rule 6ABBA. It also amended marginal heading of rule 6DD and in rule 6DD for the words ‘account payee bank draft, exceeds twenty thousand rupees’, the words, figures and letters ‘account payee bank draft or use of ele...

Read More

Mere low profitability of recipient firm not relevant to apply section 40A(2)(b)

Sharp Designers and Engineers India Pvt. Ltd. (Formerly Khinvasara Investments Pvt. Ltd.) Vs ACIT (ITAT Pune)

Sharp Designers and Engineers India Pvt. Ltd. (Formerly Khinvasara Investments Pvt. Ltd.) Vs ACIT (ITAT Pune) AO had not brought any comparables from market to make out that the case that impugned payment was excessive or unreasonable within the meaning of section 40A(2)(b) and based his conclusion merely on low profitability of recipient...

Read More

Payment not made to related party cannot be disallowed U/s. 40A(2)

Kay Dee Industries Vs JCIT (ITAT Delhi)

Kay Dee Industries Vs JCIT (ITAT Delhi) Since it was not the first year of the payment of commission to the party and the recipient of the commission income was also not related party in terms of section 40A(2), therefore, revenue was only authorized to see whether the expenditure was laid out or by the […]...

Read More

Remuneration paid to managing director in previous year cannot be a criterion for invoking provisions of section 40A(2)section 40A(2)

Benninger India Private Ltd Vs. DCIT (ITAT Mumbai)

Further, the remuneration paid to managing director in the previous year cannot be a criterion for invoking the provisions of section 40A(2) of the Act as the assessee’s turnover stood at ₹ 283 lakhs as compared to ₹ 99 lakhs in immediately previous year. This has resulted into rise of 185% in turnover. ...

Read More

Browse All Categories

CA, CS, CMA (4,979)
Company Law (6,641)
Custom Duty (8,016)
DGFT (4,363)
Excise Duty (4,398)
Fema / RBI (4,400)
Finance (4,644)
Income Tax (34,702)
SEBI (3,710)
Service Tax (3,603)

Search Posts by Date

October 2020
M T W T F S S
 1234
567891011
12131415161718
19202122232425
262728293031